Plant Physiology 73:555-559 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Plant Biologists
Articles
Variation in Quantum Yield for CO2 Uptake among C3 and C4 Plants 1
James Ehleringer and
Robert W. Pearcy
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112,
Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California 95616
The quantum yield for CO2 uptake was measured on a number of C3 and C4 monocot and dicot species. Under normal atmospheric conditions (330 microliters per liter CO2, 21% O2) and a leaf temperature of 30°C, the average quantum yields (moles CO2 per einstein) were as follows: 0.052 for C3 dicots, 0.053 for C3 grasses, 0.053 for NAD-malic enzyme type C4 dicots, 0.060 for NAD-malic enzyme type C4 grasses, 0.064 for phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase type C4 grasses, 0.061 for NADP-malic enzyme C4 dicots, and 0.065 for NADP-malic enzyme type C4 grasses. The quantum yield under normal atmospheric conditions was temperature dependent in C3 species, but apparently not in C4 species. Light and temperature conditions during growth appeared not to influence quantum yield. The significance of variation in the quantum yields of C4 plants was discussed in terms of CO2 leakage from the bundle sheath cells and suberization of apoplastic regions of the bundle sheath cells.
1 Supported by National Science Foundation grants 81-13136 and 79-21826 and by grant 81-CRCR-1-1152 from the Competitive Research Grants Office of the United States Department of Agriculture.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Skillman
Quantum yield variation across the three pathways of photosynthesis: not yet out of the dark
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(7):
1647 - 1661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Cousins, M. R. Badger, and S. von Caemmerer
C4 photosynthetic isotope exchange in NAD-ME- and NADP-ME-type grasses
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(7):
1695 - 1703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Osborne, E. J. Wythe, D. G. Ibrahim, M. E. Gilbert, and B. S. Ripley
Low temperature effects on leaf physiology and survivorship in the C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(7):
1743 - 1754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Dutilleul, L. Han, and D. L. Smith
Plant Light Interception Can Be Explained via Computed Tomography Scanning: Demonstration with Pyramidal Cedar (Thuja occidentalis, Fastigiata)
Ann. Bot.,
January 1, 2008;
101(1):
19 - 23.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tazoe, Y. T. Hanba, T. Furumoto, K. Noguchi, and I. Terashima
Relationships Between Quantum Yield for CO2 Assimilation, Activity of Key Enzymes and CO2 Leakiness in Amaranthus cruentus, a C4 Dicot, Grown in High or Low Light
Plant Cell Physiol.,
January 1, 2008;
49(1):
19 - 29.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Lee and M. Tollenaar
Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield
Crop Sci.,
December 18, 2007;
47(Supplement_3):
S-202 - S-215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. Sage and A. D. McKown
Is C4 photosynthesis less phenotypically plastic than C3 photosynthesis?
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2006;
57(2):
303 - 317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. Lizaso, W. D. Batchelor, K. J. Boote, and M. E. Westgate
Development of a Leaf-Level Canopy Assimilation Model for CERES-Maize
Agron. J.,
April 27, 2005;
97(3):
722 - 733.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Manter and J. Kerrigan
A/Ci curve analysis across a range of woody plant species: influence of regression analysis parameters and mesophyll conductance
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2004;
55(408):
2581 - 2588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Watling, M. C. Press, and W. P. Quick
Elevated CO2 Induces Biochemical and Ultrastructural Changes in Leaves of the C4 Cereal Sorghum
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2000;
123(3):
1143 - 1152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.S. Loomis and J.S. Amthor
Yield Potential, Plant Assimilatory Capacity, and Metabolic Efficiencies
Crop Sci.,
November 1, 1999;
39(6):
1584 - 1596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|