Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 73:609-613 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savage, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Savage, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, A.
Articles

In Situ Field Measurement of Leaf Water Potential Using Thermocouple Psychrometers 1

Michael J. Savage, Herman H. Wiebe2 and Alfred Cass

Department of Soil Science and Agrometeorology, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Natal, Republic of South Africa 3201

Thermocouple psychrometers are the only instruments which can measure the in situ water potential of intact leaves, and which can possibly be used to monitor leaf water potential. Unfortunately, their usefulness is limited by a number of difficulties, among them fluctuating temperatures and temperature gradients within the psychrometer, sealing of the psychrometer chamber to the leaf, shading of the leaf by the psychrometer, and resistance to water vapor diffusion by the cuticle when the stomates are closed. Using Citrus jambhiri, we have tested several psychrometer design and operational modifications and showed that in situ psychrometric measurements compared favorably with simultaneous Scholander pressure chamber measurements on neighboring leaves when the latter were corrected for the osmotic potential.


2 Biology Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321.

1 Supported by the University of Natal and the Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa. It is part of a dissertation submitted by MJS in partial fulfilment of Ph.D. requirements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. S. Campbell and K. J. McInnes
Response of In Situ Leaf Psychrometer to Cuticle Removal by Abrasion
Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 859 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Plant Biologists