Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 73:935-938 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liptay, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schopfer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liptay, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schopfer, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liptay, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schopfer, P.
Articles

Effect of Water Stress, Seed Coat Restraint, and Abscisic Acid upon Different Germination Capabilities of Two Tomato Lines at Low Temperature 1

Albert Liptay2 and Peter Schopfer

Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Harrow, Ontario NOR 1G0 Canada, Biologisches Institut II, Universität Freiburg im Breisgau, D-7800 Freiburg, Germany

Two tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) lines with greatly different capabilities to germinate at 10°C were compared with respect to sensitivity to experimental treatments which affect the water status of the embryo. Germination rates and final percentages could be drastically changed (at 25°C) by (a) removing the mechanical constraint from the radicle tip, (b) imposing water stress by an osmoticum, (c) stress hardening of the seeds through osmotic pretreatment, and (d) inhibiting embryo expansion by abscisic acid (ABA). All treatments showed a similar difference in germination vigor between the two lines indicating that cold sensitivity is in fact a matter of water relations rather than of phase transitions in membrane lipids. Inhibition of germination by ABA was completely abolished by removing the mechanical constraint from the radicle tip. Osmotic stress of –3 bar which quantitatively replaced this constraint in inhibiting germination also restored the sensitivity to ABA. It is concluded that all these treatments act on the balance between the hydraulic extension force of the embryo radicle and the opposing force of the seed layers covering the radicle tip. The difference in cold sensitivity between the two seed lines resides either in the osmotic potential or the pressure potential of the germinating embryo.


2 To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

1 Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 206) and Agriculture Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Muller, S. Tintelnot, and G. Leubner-Metzger
Endosperm-limited Brassicaceae Seed Germination: Abscisic Acid Inhibits Embryo-induced Endosperm Weakening of Lepidium sativum (cress) and Endosperm Rupture of Cress and Arabidopsis thaliana
Plant Cell Physiol., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 864 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. E. Toorop, A. C. van Aelst, and H. W.M. Hilhorst
The second step of the biphasic endosperm cap weakening that mediates tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seed germination is under control of ABA
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2000; 51(349): 1371 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Plant Biologists