|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 74:475-480 (1984) © 1984 American Society of Plant Biologists Effects of Ultraviolet-B Irradiance on Soybean 1V. The Dependence of Plant Sensitivity on the Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density during and after Leaf ExpansionDepartment of Botany, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
Soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr. cv Essex) were grown in a green-house, and the first trifoliate leaf was either allowed to expand under a high photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) (1.4 millimoles per square meter per second) or a low PPFD (0.8 millimoles per square meter per second). After full leaf expansion, plants from each treatment were placed into a factorial design experiment with two levels of ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation (0 and 80 milliwatts per square meter biologically effective UV-B) and two levels of concomitant PPFD (0.8 and 1.4 millimoles per square meter per second) resulting in a total of eight treatments. Measurements of net photosynthesis and the associated diffusion conductances, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity, chlorophyll and flavonoid concentrations, and leaf anatomy were examined for all treatments. Leaves expanded in the high PPFD were unaffected by UV-B radiation while those expanded in the low PPFD were sensitive to UV-B-induced damage. Likewise, plants which were UV-B irradiated concomitantly with the high PPFD were resistant to UV-B damage, while plants irradiated under the low PPFD were sensitive. The results of this study indicate that both anatomical/morphological and physiological/biochemical factors contribute toward plant sensitivity to UV-B radiation.
1 Supported partially by the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Research Laboratory in Corvallis, OR (CR 808-035-020) and grants from the Graduate School and Provost to A. H. T. Scientific Article No. A-3397. Contribution No. 6470, of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Botany. Although the work described in this article has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to the Agency's required peer and policy review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the view of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|