Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 75:634-638 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Proebsting, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Proebsting, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Proebsting, W. M.
Articles

Genetic Regulation of Flowering in Grafts on Pisum sativum L. 1

William M. Proebsting

Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Lf, E, Sn, and Hr are major loci that condition the flowering and photoperiod responses of Pisum sativum L. Genetic lines containing the dominant alleles of these loci are characterized by flowering in long days, but having a prolonged (>50 node) vegetative phase in short days. A representative of this class, response type G, was used as a receptor in short days for donors of other flowering response types. The qualitative and quantitative flowering response of G receptors depended on the genotype of the donor. Donors containing sn hr induced the earliest development, followed by sn Hr and Sn hr donors. The Lf and E loci in foliar donors apparently did not affect flowering of G. Five-leaved > single-leaved > cotyledonary donors in effecting a flowering response in G, in part due to the longer life of the foliar donors. The responses of G to the various donors were generally consistent with the proposed roles of Lf, E, and Sn, but the role of Hr in these grafts was unclear.


1 Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper no. 7042.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Plant Biologists