Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 77:461-464 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assmann, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zeiger, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assmann, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zeiger, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Assmann, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zeiger, E.
Articles

Stomatal Responses to CO2 in Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium1

Role of the Guard Cell Chloroplast

Sarah M. Assmann2 and Eduardo Zeiger

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

A role of the guard cell chloroplasts in the CO2 response of stomata was investigated through a comparison of the leaf gas exchange characteristics of two closely related orchids: Paphiopedilum harrisianum, which lacks guard cell chloroplasts and Phragmipedium longifolium, which has chlorophyllous guard cells. Leaves of both species had an apparent quantum yield for assimilation of about 0.05, with photosynthesis saturating at 0.300 to 0.400 millimoles per square meter per second. CO2 curves were obtained by measuring steady-state assimilation and stomatal conductance under 0.180 or 0.053 millimoles per square meter per second white light, or darkness, at 0 to 400 microliters per liter ambient CO2. The response of assimilation to changes in CO2 was similar in the two species, but the response of conductance was consistently weaker in Paphiopedilum than in Phragmipedium. The data suggest involvement of guard cell chloroplasts in the stomatal response to CO2 and in the coupling of assimilation and conductance in the intact leaf.


2 S.M.A. gratefully acknowledges the tenure of McKnight and National Science Foundation predoctoral fellowships.

1 Supported by the Department of Energy (81 ER10924), the United States Department of Agriculture, and the National Science Foundation (PCM 8214378).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. D. Talbott, J. Zhu, S. W. Han, and E. Zeiger
Phytochrome and Blue Light-Mediated Stomatal Opening in the Orchid, Paphiopedilum
Plant Cell Physiol., June 15, 2002; 43(6): 639 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists