Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 77:513-519 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (33)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Echeverria, E.
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Echeverria, E.
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Echeverria, E.
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, J.
Articles

Isolation of Amyloplasts from Developing Maize Endosperm 1

Ed Echeverria, Charles Boyer, Kang-Chien Liu and Jack Shannon

Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Methods for the formation of protoplasts from developing maize endosperm and for the aqueous isolation of intact amyloplasts from such protoplasts are described. Protoplasts were obtained after incubating endosperm slices in a medium containing cellulase and pectolyase for 5 days at 4°C or 5 hours at 30°C. After purification in a Ficoll density gradient, the protoplasts were reptured by forcing the suspension through a Nitex mesh (20 micrometer) positioned at the lower end of a modified disposable syringe. The resulting filtrate was layered on a discontinuous Ficoll density gradient of 30, 15, and 10%. Each Ficoll solution contained 0.7 molar sucrose, 10 millimolar arginine, 10 millimolar DL-dithiothreitol, 50 millimolar 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (pH 5.6), and 2 millimolar CaCl2. After 3 hours in the cold, an amyloplast fraction 50 to 93% intact and free from cytoplasmic, mitochondrial, and glyoxysomal contamination was recovered in the 15% Ficoll layer. Amyloplast intactness was estimated by fluorescent microscopy and activity of certain amyloplast marker enzymes before and after rupture of the amyloplast membrane. Starch branching enzyme, ADPG-pyrophosphorylase, and nitrite reductase were used as amyloplast marker enzymes.


1 Supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture Competitive Grant 83-CRCR-1-1294. Contribution No. 51, Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University. Authorized for publication as paper No. 6957 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. C. Shannon, F.-M. Pien, H. Cao, and K.-C. Liu
Brittle-1, an Adenylate Translocator, Facilitates Transfer of Extraplastidial Synthesized ADP-Glucose into Amyloplasts of Maize Endosperms
Plant Physiology, August 1, 1998; 117(4): 1235 - 1252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y. Yu, H. He Mu, C. Mu-Forster, and B. P. Wasserman
Polypeptides of the Maize Amyloplast Stroma . Stromal Localization of Starch-Biosynthetic Enzymes and Identification of an 81-Kilodalton Amyloplast Stromal Heat-Shock Cognate
Plant Physiology, April 1, 1998; 116(4): 1451 - 1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists