Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 77:602-607 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snow, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snow, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Snow, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tingey, D. T.
Articles

Evaluation of a System for the Imposition of Plant Water Stress 1

Michael D. Snow2 and David T. Tingey

Department of Physical and Life Sciences, University of Portland, Portland, Oregon 97203, United States Environmental Protective Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97333

A system which imposes a range of water stress levels was developed and evaluated. Water stress was controlled by employing a screen to suspend roots above a water column of known height. Levels of water stress were imposed by changing water column height and/or hydraulic conductivity of the medium in the column. The system was evaluated in a series of growth chamber experiments in which sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L. cv NK894) were given three levels of water availability for a period of 3 weeks. Third leaf midday water potentials at the end of the trials ranged from –0.73 ± 0.04 to –2.35 ± 0.17 megapascals in waterstressed plants compared to –0.40 ± 0.02 megapascals for control plants. Repetition of experiments showed no statistical differences in leaf water potentials, plant leaf areas, or plastochron indices between trials. During the experiments, the severity and pattern of water stress developments was related to both water column height and conductivity of the medium. Control plants exhibited normal diurnal water relations and transpirational behavior. Use of this system avoids many problems associated with other techniques and provides a means for subjecting plants to reproducible water stress levels for extended periods of time.


2 Supported by National Science Foundation Grant SPI-8165062.

1 Contribution from the United States Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. Batlla, M. Nicoletta, and R. Benech-Arnold
Sensitivity of Polygonum aviculare Seeds to Light as Affected by Soil Moisture Conditions
Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. G. Lopez, G. M. Banowetz, C. J. Peterson, and W. E. Kronstad
Dehydrin Expression and Drought Tolerance in Seven Wheat Cultivars
Crop Sci., March 1, 2003; 43(2): 577 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. Bissuel-Belaygue, A. A. Cowan, A. H. Marshall, and J. Wery
Reproductive Development of White Clover (Trifolium repens L.) is Not Impaired by a Moderate Water Deficit That Reduces Vegetative Growth: I. Inflorescence, Floret, and Ovule Production
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 406 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. Bissuel-Belaygue, A. A. Cowan, A. H. Marshall, and J. Wery
Reproductive Development of White Clover (Trifolium repens L.) is Not Impaired by a Moderate Water Deficit That Reduces Vegetative Growth: II. Fertilization Efficiency and Seed Set
Crop Sci., March 1, 2002; 42(2): 414 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists