Plant Physiology 78:183-191 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists
Articles
Water Transport in the Midrib Tissue of Maize Leaves 1
Direct Measurement of the Propagation of Changes in Cell Turgor Across a Plant Tissue
Mark E. Westgate2 and
Ernst Steudle
Arbeitsgruppe Membranforschung am Institut für Medizin, Kernforschungsanlage Jülich, Postfach 1913, D-5170 Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany
Water movement across plant tissues occurs along two paths: from cell-to-cell and in the apoplasm. We examined the contribution of these two paths to the kinetics of water transport across the parenchymatous midrib tissue of the maize (Zea mays L.) leaf. Water relations parameters (hydraulic conductivity, Lp; cell elastic coefficient, ; half-time of water exchange for individual cells, T ) of individual parenchyma cells determined with the pressure probe varied in different regions of the midrib. In the adaxial region, Lp = (0.3 ± 0.3)·105 centimeters per second per bar, = 103 ± 72 bar, and T = 7.9 ± 4.8 seconds (n = seven cells); whereas, in the abaxial region, Lp = (2.5 ± 0.9)·105 centimeters per second per bar, = 41 ± 9 bar, and T = 1.3 ± 0.5 seconds (n = 7). This zonal variation in Lp, , and T indicates that tissue inhomogeneities exist for these parameters and could have an effect on the kinetics of water transport across the tissue.
The diffusivity of the tissue to water (Dt) obtained from the sorption kinetics of rehydrating tissue was Dt = (1.1 ± 0.4)·106 square centimeters per second (n = 6). The diffusivity of the cell-to-cell path (Dc) calculated from pressure probe data ranged from Dc = 0.4·106 square centimeters per second in the adaxial region to Dc = 6.1·106 square centimeters per second in the abaxial region of the tissue. Dt Dc suggests substantial cell-to-cell transport of water occurred during rehydration. However, the tissue diffusivity calculated from the kinetics of pressure-propagation across the tissue (Dt') was Dt' = (33.1 ± 8.0)·106 square centimeters per second (n = 8) and more than 1 order of magnitude larger than Dt. Also, the hydraulic conductance of the midrib tissue (Lpm per square centimeter of surface) estimated from pressure-induced flows across several parenchyma cell layers was Lpm = (8.9 ± 5.6)·105 centimeters per second per bar (n = 5) and much larger than Lp.
These results indicate that the preferential path for water transport across the midrib tissue depends on the nature of the driving forces present within the tissue. Under osmotic conditions, the cell-to-cell path dominates, whereas under hydrostatic conditions water moves primarily in the apoplasm.
2 Present address: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, North Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267.
1 Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Zi 99/8.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. X. Kim and E. Steudle
Gating of aquaporins by light and reactive oxygen species in leaf parenchyma cells of the midrib of Zea mays
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2009;
60(2):
547 - 556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. X. Kim and E. Steudle
Light and turgor affect the water permeability (aquaporins) of parenchyma cells in the midrib of leaves of Zea mays
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 7, 2007;
(2007)
erm270v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Volkov, C. Hachez, M. Moshelion, X. Draye, F. Chaumont, and W. Fricke
Water permeability differs between growing and non-growing barley leaf tissues
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
58(3):
377 - 390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Meyer, E. Steudle, and C. A. Peterson
Patterns and kinetics of water uptake by soybean seeds
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
58(3):
717 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. FRICKE
Biophysical Limitation of Cell Elongation in Cereal Leaves
Ann. Bot.,
August 1, 2002;
90(2):
157 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Steudle
Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2000;
51(350):
1531 - 1542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|