Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 78:183-191 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westgate, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Steudle, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westgate, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Steudle, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Westgate, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Steudle, E.
Articles

Water Transport in the Midrib Tissue of Maize Leaves 1

Direct Measurement of the Propagation of Changes in Cell Turgor Across a Plant Tissue

Mark E. Westgate2 and Ernst Steudle

Arbeitsgruppe Membranforschung am Institut für Medizin, Kernforschungsanlage Jülich, Postfach 1913, D-5170 Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany

Water movement across plant tissues occurs along two paths: from cell-to-cell and in the apoplasm. We examined the contribution of these two paths to the kinetics of water transport across the parenchymatous midrib tissue of the maize (Zea mays L.) leaf. Water relations parameters (hydraulic conductivity, Lp; cell elastic coefficient, {varepsilon}; half-time of water exchange for individual cells, T1/2) of individual parenchyma cells determined with the pressure probe varied in different regions of the midrib. In the adaxial region, Lp = (0.3 ± 0.3)·10–5 centimeters per second per bar, {varepsilon} = 103 ± 72 bar, and T1/2 = 7.9 ± 4.8 seconds (n = seven cells); whereas, in the abaxial region, Lp = (2.5 ± 0.9)·10–5 centimeters per second per bar, {varepsilon} = 41 ± 9 bar, and T1/2 = 1.3 ± 0.5 seconds (n = 7). This zonal variation in Lp, {varepsilon}, and T1/2 indicates that tissue inhomogeneities exist for these parameters and could have an effect on the kinetics of water transport across the tissue.

The diffusivity of the tissue to water (Dt) obtained from the sorption kinetics of rehydrating tissue was Dt = (1.1 ± 0.4)·10–6 square centimeters per second (n = 6). The diffusivity of the cell-to-cell path (Dc) calculated from pressure probe data ranged from Dc = 0.4·10–6 square centimeters per second in the adaxial region to Dc = 6.1·10–6 square centimeters per second in the abaxial region of the tissue. Dt ~= Dc suggests substantial cell-to-cell transport of water occurred during rehydration. However, the tissue diffusivity calculated from the kinetics of pressure-propagation across the tissue (Dt') was Dt' = (33.1 ± 8.0)·10–6 square centimeters per second (n = 8) and more than 1 order of magnitude larger than Dt. Also, the hydraulic conductance of the midrib tissue (Lpm per square centimeter of surface) estimated from pressure-induced flows across several parenchyma cell layers was Lpm = (8.9 ± 5.6)·10–5 centimeters per second per bar (n = 5) and much larger than Lp.

These results indicate that the preferential path for water transport across the midrib tissue depends on the nature of the driving forces present within the tissue. Under osmotic conditions, the cell-to-cell path dominates, whereas under hydrostatic conditions water moves primarily in the apoplasm.


2 Present address: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, North Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN 56267.

1 Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Zi 99/8.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Y. X. Kim and E. Steudle
Gating of aquaporins by light and reactive oxygen species in leaf parenchyma cells of the midrib of Zea mays
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2009; 60(2): 547 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
Y. X. Kim and E. Steudle
Light and turgor affect the water permeability (aquaporins) of parenchyma cells in the midrib of leaves of Zea mays
J. Exp. Bot., December 7, 2007; (2007) erm270v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
V. Volkov, C. Hachez, M. Moshelion, X. Draye, F. Chaumont, and W. Fricke
Water permeability differs between growing and non-growing barley leaf tissues
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 377 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. J. Meyer, E. Steudle, and C. A. Peterson
Patterns and kinetics of water uptake by soybean seeds
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2007; 58(3): 717 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
W. FRICKE
Biophysical Limitation of Cell Elongation in Cereal Leaves
Ann. Bot., August 1, 2002; 90(2): 157 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. Steudle
Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2000; 51(350): 1531 - 1542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists