This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Streit, L. Articles by Harper, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Streit, L. Articles by Harper, J. E. Agricola Articles by Streit, L. Articles by Harper, J. E.

Articles

Nitrate Reductases from Wild-Type and nr₁-Mutant Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) Leaves ¹

I. Purification, Kinetics, and Physical Properties

Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

NADH:nitrate reductase (EC 1.6.6.1) and NAD(P)H:nitrate reductase (EC 1.6.6.2) were purified from wild-type soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr., cv Williams) and nr₁-mutant soybean plants. Purification included Blue Sepharose- and hydroxylapatite-column chromatography using acetone powders from fully expanded unifoliolate leaves as the enzyme source.

Two forms of constitutive nitrate reductase were sequentially eluted with NADPH and NADH from Blue Sepharose loaded with extract from wild-type plants grown on urea as sole nitrogen source. The form eluted with NADPH was designated c₁NR, and the form eluted with NADH was designated c₂NR. Nitrate-grown nr₁ mutant soybean plants yielded a NADH:nitrate reductase (designated iNR) when Blue Sepharose columns were eluted with NADH; NADPH failed to elute any NR form from Blue Sepharose loaded with this extract. Both c₁NR and c₂NR had similar pH optima of 6.5, sedimentation behavior (s_20,w of 5.5-6.0), and electrophoretic mobility. However, c₁NR was more active with NADPH than with NADH, while c₂NR preferred NADH as electron donor. Apparent Michaelis constants for nitrate were 5 millimolar (c₁NR) and 0.19 millimolar (c₂NR). The iNR from the mutant had a pH optimum of 7.5, s_20,w of 7.6, and was less mobile on polyacrylamide gels than c₁NR and c₂NR. The iNR preferred NADH over NADPH and had an apparent Michaelis constant of 0.13 millimolar for nitrate.

Thus, wild-type soybean contains two forms of constitutive nitrate reductase, both differing in their physical properties from nitrate reductases common in higher plants. The inducible nitrate reductase form present in soybeans, however, appears to be similar to most substrateinduced nitrate reductases found in higher plants.

¹ Supported by United States Department of Agriculture Competitive Research Grant, Agreement No. 82-CRCR-1-1038.