Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 78:85-88 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (36)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Downton, W. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Downton, W. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Downton, W. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. P.
Articles

Photosynthetic and Stomatal Responses of Spinach Leaves to Salt Stress

W. John S. Downton, W. James R. Grant and Simon P. Robinson

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Division of Horticultural Research, G.P.O. Box 350, Adelaide 5001, South Australia, Australia

The gas exchange of spinach plants, salt-stressed by adding NaCl to the nutrient solution in increments of 25 millimolar per day to a final concentration of 200 millimolar, was studied 3 weeks after starting NaCl treatment. Photosynthesis became light saturated at 1100 to 1400 micromoles per square meter per second in salt-treated plants and at approximately 2000 micromoles per square meter per second in control plants. Photosynthetic capacity of the mesophyll measured as a function of intercellular partial pressure of CO2 at the light intensity prevailing during growth and at light saturation were both decreased in the salttreated plants. The CO2 compensation points and relative enhancements of photosynthesis at low O2 were not affected by salinity. The lower photosynthetic rates in salt-treated leaves at 450 micromoles per square meter per second were associated with a 70% reduction in stomatal conductance and low intercellular CO2 (219 microbars; cf. 285 microbars for controls). Increasing photon flux density to light saturation extended the linear portions of the CO2 response curves, increased stomatal conductances, increased intercellular CO2 in the salt-treated plants, but lowered it in controls, and accentuated differences in photosynthetic rate (area basis) between the treatments.

Leaves from salt-treated plants were thicker but contained about 73% of the chlorophyll per unit area of control plants. When photosynthetic rates were expressed on a chlorophyll basis there was no difference in initial slope of assimilation versus intercellular CO2 between treatments. Photosynthetic rates (chlorophyll basis) at light saturation differed only by 20% which was also observed earlier with isolated, intact chloroplasts (Robinson et al. 1983 Plant Physiol 73: 238-242).

Measurement of carbon isotope ratio revealed less discrimination against 13C with salt treatment and confirmed the persistence of low intercellular partial pressures of CO2 during plant growth. The development of a thicker leaf with less chlorophyll per unit area during salt treatment permitted stomatal conductance and intercellular partial pressure of CO2 to decline without restricting photosynthesis and had the benefit of greatly increasing water use efficiency.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists