Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 79:815-819 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toman, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toman, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Toman, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, R. R.
Articles

Comparison of Patterns of Accumulation of Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase Antigen and Catalytic Activity and Measurement of Antigen Half-Life during the Cell Cycle of Chlorella sorokiniana1

P. David Toman2 and Robert R. Schmidt3

Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061

By use of specific immunochemical procedures, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase), antigen and catalytic activity were shown to have coincident step-patterns of accumulation during the cell cycle of Chlorella sorokiniana. Pulse-chase studies, employing radioactive sulfate, were performed during the period of rapid accumulation of enzyme activity and during the period of constant enzyme activity in the cell cycle. No degradation of RuBPCase antigen could be detected during either of these cell cycle periods. Thus, the step-pattern of accumulation of RuBPCase activity resulted from periodic synthesis of an enzyme that was stable under steady-state cell cycle conditions. Although inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide, at different times in the cell cycle in the light, resulted in rapid decay of RuBPCase activity, this loss in activity occurred without detectable loss in enzyme antigen. When synchronous cells were placed into the dark, to slow the rate of protein synthesis in the absence of cycloheximide, the levels of enzyme antigen and activity decreased by 30 and 50%, respectively, during the 10-hour dark period. Thus, in C. sorokiniana changes in RuBPCase activity do not necessarily reflect parallel changes in enzyme antigen, particularly when cell growth is perturbed by changes from steady-state cultural conditions.


2 Meloy Laboratories, Inc., 6715 Electronic Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22151.

3 Present address: Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.

1 Supported by the Science and Education Administration of the United States Department of Agriculture under grants 5901-0410-8-0097 and 59-2121-0-1-097-0 from the Competitive Research Grants Office. Florida Agriculture Experiment Stations Journal Series 6355.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists