Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 79:1044-1047 (1985)
© 1985 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (146)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I. K.
Articles

Stimulation of Glutathione Synthesis in Photorespiring Plants by Catalase Inhibitors 1

Ivan K. Smith

Department of Botany, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701-2979

The effect of various herbicides on glutathione levels in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.), and corn (Zea mays L.) was examined. Illumination of excised barley, tobacco, and soybean plants for 8 hours in solution containing 2 millimolar aminotriazole (a catalase inhibitor) resulted in an increase in leaf glutathione from 250 to 400 nanomoles per gram fresh weight to 600 to 1800 nanomoles per gram fresh weight, depending on the species tested. All of this increase could be accounted for as oxidized glutathione. Between 25 and 50% of this oxidized glutathione was reduced when plants were darkened for 16 hours, but there was no significant decline in total glutathione. Another catalase inhibitor, thiosemicarbazide, was as effective as aminotriazole in elevating glutathione in soybean but was less effective in barley and tobacco. Glyphosate, an inhibitor of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, had no significant effect on glutathione levels in any of the plants examined. Whereas methyl viologen (paraquat), which is a sink for photosystem I electrons, caused oxidation of leaf glutathione in all of the plants but did not increase the total amount of glutathione present.


1 Supported by National Science Foundation Grant PCM 8104535.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. R. Mahan and S. A. Mauget
Antioxidant Metabolism in Cotton Seedlings Exposed to Temperature Stress in the Field
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2337 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. R. Mahan and D. F. Wanjura
Seasonal Patterns of Glutathione and Ascorbate Metabolism in Field-Grown Cotton under Water Stress
Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 193 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Senda and K. Ogawa
Induction of PR-1 Accumulation Accompanied by Runaway Cell Death in the lsd1 Mutant of Arabidopsis is Dependent on Glutathione Levels but Independent of the Redox State of Glutathione
Plant Cell Physiol., November 15, 2004; 45(11): 1578 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
F. Tommasi, C. Paciolla, M. C. de Pinto, and L. D. Gara
A comparative study of glutathione and ascorbate metabolism during germination of Pinus pinea L. seeds
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2001; 52(361): 1647 - 1654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. F. Dat, C. H. Foyer, and I. M. Scott
Changes in Salicylic Acid and Antioxidants during Induced Thermotolerance in Mustard Seedlings
Plant Physiology, December 1, 1998; 118(4): 1455 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
C. Xiang and D. J. Oliver
Glutathione Metabolic Genes Coordinately Respond to Heavy Metals and Jasmonic Acid in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL, September 1, 1998; 10(9): 1539 - 1550.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society of Plant Biologists