This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (46) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ben-Yehoshua, S. Articles by Young, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ben-Yehoshua, S. Articles by Young, R. Agricola Articles by Ben-Yehoshua, S. Articles by Young, R.

Articles

Resistance of Citrus Fruit to Mass Transport of Water Vapor and Other Gases ¹

Department of Fruit and Vegetable Storage, ARO, The Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel

The resistance of oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) and grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) to ethylene, O₂, CO₂, and H₂O mass transport was investigated anatomically with scanning electron microscope and physiologically by gas exchange measurements at steady state. The resistance of untreated fruit to water vapor is far less than to ethylene, CO₂ and O₂. Waxing partially or completely plugs stomatal pores and forms an intermittent cracked layer over the surface of fruit, restricting transport of ethylene, O₂, and CO₂, but not of water; whereas individual sealing of fruit with high density polyethylene films reduces water transport by 90% without substantially inhibiting gas exchange.

Stomata of harvested citrus fruits are essentially closed. However, ethylene, O₂ and CO₂ still diffuse mainly through the residual stomatal opening where the relative transport resistance (approximately 6,000 seconds per centimeter) depends on the relative diffusivity of each gas in air. Water moves preferentially by a different pathway, probably through a liquid aqueous phase in the cuticle where water conductance is 60-fold greater. Other gases are constrained from using this pathway because their diffusivity in liquid water is 10⁴-fold less than in air.

³ Deceased in September 11, 1983.

¹ Supported in part by grant I-185-80 from BARD, The United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund. Contribution No. 1261-E, 1984 series, from ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Genard and B. Gouble ETHY. A Theory of Fruit Climacteric Ethylene Emission Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 531 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]