Plant Physiol. EPICENTRE Biotechnologies
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 80:239-241 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fox, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Articles

Osmotic Response of Sugar Beet Source Leaves at CO2 Compensation Point 1

Theodore C. Fox2 and Donald R. Geiger

Department of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0001

As sugar beet source leaves lowered the CO2 concentration to compensation point in a closed atmosphere, leaf thickness and relative water content decreased. Leaf water potential declined rapidly from –0.5 to –1.4 megapascals. At 340 microliters CO2 per liter, water potential and sucrose, glucose, and fructose contents were steady in photosynthesizing source leaves. Within 90 minutes after leaves were exposed to a CO2 concentration at the compensation point, leaf sucrose content declined to 60% of the preteatment level, rapidly in the first 30 minutes and then more slowly. During the subsequent 200 minutes, sucrose content increased to 180% of pretreatment level. Glucose and fructose remained unchanged during the treatment. Degradation of starch was sufficient to account for the additional sucrose that accumulated. Labeled carbon lost from starch appeared in sucrose and several other compounds that likely contributed to the recovery in leaf water content.


2 Present address: Department of Horticulture, 2001 Fyffe Court, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

1 Supported by National Science Foundation Grants PCM-8008720 and DMB-8303957.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. C. Servaites and D. R. Geiger
Kinetic characteristics of chloroplast glucose transport
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2002; 53(374): 1581 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Plant Biologists