This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vaughn, K. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vaughn, K. C. Agricola Articles by Vaughn, K. C.

Articles

Characterization of Triazine-Resistant and -Susceptible Isolines of Canola (Brassica napus L.)

United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, Southern Weed Science Laboratory, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776

Morphometric, electrophoretic, and immunological procedures were used to probe the structural and physiological differences between triazine-resistant (R) and susceptible (S) isolines of canola (Brassica napus L.). The R biotype exhibited increased grana stacking and decreased amounts of starch compared to the S biotype. Likewise, characters associated with an increase in grana stacking (lower chlorophyll a/b ratio, increased chlorophyll a/b light-harvesting complex, and relatively lower amounts of the P700 chlorophyll a protein and chloroplast coupling factor) were all observed in the R isoline of canola. Proteins which occur with approximately equal frequency in grana and stroma lamellae (plastocyanin, cutochrome f) or present only in the stroma (ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) were not quantitatively different in the two biotypes. Gross anatomical parameters (volume of epidermis, palisade mesophyll, spongy mesophyll, and air space) were similar in the two isolines. Thus, the triazine-resistance mutation does not confer a shade-type anatomy despite the chloroplast changes that are characteristic of shade biotypes or shade adaptions. These data indicate that the differences in chloroplast structure noted previously in comparisons of nonisonuclear R and S weed biotypes reflect differences in the triazineresistance factor rather than characters unrelated to triazine resistance.