Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 83:360-364 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (98)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Genty, B.
Right arrow Articles by Da Silva, J. B. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Genty, B.
Right arrow Articles by Da Silva, J. B. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Genty, B.
Right arrow Articles by Da Silva, J. B. V.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Effects of Drought on Primary Photosynthetic Processes of Cotton Leaves 1

Bernard Genty, Jean-Marie Briantais and Jorge Bravo Vieira Da Silva

Laboratoire d'Ecologie Générale et Appliquée, Université Paris VII, 2 Place Jussieu, 75221 Paris Cedex 05, Laboratoire de Photosynthèse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France

The effects of drought on Photosystem II (PSII) fluorescence and photosynthetic electron transport activities were analyzed in cotton. Water stress did not modify the amplitude of leaf variable fluorescence at room temperature in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) nor at 77 K. It is therefore concluded that photon collection, their distribution between the two photosystems, and PSII photochemistry are unaffected by the stress. In droughted leaves at room temperature under low exciting light, the transitory maximum (Fp) and steady state (Ft) fluorescence levels are increased; under high exciting light, Fp level and the rise time from the initial level (Fo) to Fp are unchanged, whereas Fp to Ft decay time is increased. These results infer that the drought slows the rate of plastoquinone reoxidation. This conclusion agrees with a larger proportion of reduced primary PSII electron acceptor QA measured at the steady state under low light. In thylakoids isolated from droughted leaves, PSII mediated electron flow was the same as in thylakoids from control leaves, whereas PSI mediated electron transport was inhibited. It is shown that water stress does not induce sensitization to photoinhibition in cotton.


1 Supported by a scholarship from Ministère de l'Industrie et de la Recherche to B. G.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew
Physiological Consequences of Moisture Deficit Stress in Cotton
Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
G. CORNIC and C. FRESNEAU
Photosynthetic Carbon Reduction and Carbon Oxidation Cycles are the Main Electron Sinks for Photosystem II Activity During a Mild Drought
Ann. Bot., June 15, 2002; 89(7): 887 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C.L. V. Santos, A. Campos, H. Azevedo, and G. Caldeira
In situ and in vitro senescence induced by KCl stress: nutritional imbalance, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant metabolism
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2001; 52(355): 351 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists