Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 83:457-459 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrell, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrell, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harrell, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Net CO2 Assimilation Rate of Grapevine Leaves in Response to Trunk Girdling and Gibberellic Acid Application 1

Dean C. Harrell and Larry E. Williams

Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, California 93648, The Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverband Avenue, Parlier, California 93648

Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), and weight per unit leaf area (W) were determined on Thompson Seedless grapevines grown in the field. Treatments included fruit set applications of gibberellic acid (40 milligrams gibberellic acid (GA3) per liter) to vines, shoots and clusters, alone and in combination with trunk girdling. Leaf A and gs were measured prior to and 3, 6, and 13 days after fruit set. Weight per unit leaf area was determined on leaves collected subsequent to gas exchange measurements. Leaf A of girdled vines was reduced approximately 30% when compared to the control 13 days after treatment. The reduction in A due to girdling was not as great when vines were sprayed with GA3. GA3 sprays alone had no significant effect on A. Stomatal conductance was reduced by girdling 13 days after treatment. Weight per unit leaf area was 17% greater for trunk girdled vines when compared to the controls. Results indicate GA3 affected net CO2 assimilation rate only on girdled vines, a treatment which increased weight per unit leaf area.


1 Supported in part by a Jastro Shields Research Scholarship to D. C. H. and a Faculty Research grant to L. E. W.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
T. Yamane, K. Shibayama, Y. Hamana, and H. Yakushiji
Response of Container-Grown Girdled Grapevines to Short-Term Water-Deficit Stress
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2009; 60(1): 50 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Urban, M. Lechaudel, and P. Lu
Effect of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in Mangifera indica L.
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2004; 55(405): 2075 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists