|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 83:573-578 (1987) © 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists Drought Stress and Elevated CO2 Effects on Soybean Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity and Canopy Photosynthetic Rates 1Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Soybean (Glycine max [L.] cv Bragg) was grown at 330 or 660 microliters CO2 per liter in outdoor, controlled-environment chambers. When the plants were 50 days old, drought stress was imposed by gradually reducing irrigation each evening so that plants wilted earlier each succeeding day. On the ninth day, as the pots ran out of water CO2 exchange rate (CER) decreased rapidly to near zero for the remainder of the day. Both CO2-enrichment and drought stress reduced the total (HCO3/Mg2+-activated) extractable ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase) activity, as expressed on a chlorophyll basis. In addition, drought stress when canopy CER values and leaf water potentials were lowest, reduced the initial (nonactivated) RuBPCase activity by 50% compared to the corresponding unstressed treatments. This suggests that moderate to severe drought stress reduces the in vivo activation state of RuBPCase, as well as lowers the total activity. It is hypothesized that stromal acidification under drought stress causes the lowered initial RuBPCase activities. The Km(CO2) values of activated RuBPCase from stressed and unstressed plants were similar; 15.0 and 12.6 micromolar, respectively. RuBP levels were 10 to 30% lower in drought stressed as compared to unstressed treatments. However, RuBP levels increased from near zero at night to around 150 to 200 nanomoles per milligram chlorophyll during the day, even as water potentials and canopy CERs decreased. This suggests that the rapid decline in canopy CER cannot be attributed to drought stress induced limitations in the RuBP regeneration capability. Thus, in soybean leaves, a nonstomatal limitation of leaf photosynthesis under drought stress conditions appears due, in part, to a reduction of the in vivo activity of RuBPCase. Because initial RuBPCase activities were not reduced as much as canopy CER values, this enzymic effect does not explain entirely the response of soybean photosynthesis to drought stress.
2 Present address: Horticultural Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2120 Camden Road, Orlando, FL 32803. 1 Supported in part by the United States Department of Energy, Carbon Dioxide Research Division Interagency Agreement No. DE-AI01-81ER60001 with the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 7407. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|