Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 83:878-883 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ferreira, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, D. D.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Protein Degradation in Lemna with Particular Reference to Ribulose Bisphosphate Carboxylase

II. The Effect of Nutrient Starvation

Ricardo B. Ferreira and David D. Davies

School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom

The concept of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase as a storage protein is not supported in the case of Lemna minor, where the enzyme appears to be particularly stable under conditions of nitrogen starvation. Total nutrient starvation in light and in the dark induced the degradation of this enzyme, but not at an enhanced rate compared with other leaf proteins and, surprisingly, darkness inhibited the degradation of chlorophyll which occurs with total nutrient starvation in the light. The data suggest that Lemna is not programmed to senesce in response to nutrient starvation. Differences in the pattern of protein degradation, which occurred under the stress conditions employed, are not consistent with a simple model of protein degradation in which the degradative system is assumed to be located in the vacuole. The data is best explained by a dual system in which cytosolic proteins are degraded by a vacuolar/lysosomal system and chloroplast proteins are degraded within the chloroplast. Whatever the system of degradation, our data do not support the proposed correlation between the rate of protein degradation and either protein charge or size.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists