Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 83:938-940 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ting, I. P.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Minor Physiological Response to Elevated CO2 by the CAM Plant Agave vilmoriniana1

Stan R. Szarek, Peter A. Holthe and Irwin P. Ting

Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, Department of Botany and Microbiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287

One-year-old plants of the CAM leaf succulent Agave vilmoriniana Berger were grown outdoors at Riverside, California. Potted plants were acclimated to CO2-enrichment (about 750 microliters per liter) by growth for 2 weeks in an open-top polyethylene chamber. Control plants were grown nearby where the ambient CO2 concentration was about 370 microliters per liter. When the plants were well watered, CO2-induced differences in stomatal conductances and CO2 assimilation rates over the entire 24-hour period were not large. There was a large nocturnal acidification in both CO2 treatments and insignificant differences in leaf chlorophyll content. Well watered plants maintained water potentials of –0.3 to –0.4 megapascals. When other plants were allowed to dry to water potentials of –1.2 to –1.7 megapascals, stomatal conductances and CO2 uptake rates were reduced in magnitude, with the biggest difference in Phase IV photosynthesis. The minor nocturnal response to CO2 by this species is interpreted to indicate saturated, or nearly saturated, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity at current atmospheric CO2 concentrations. CO2-enhanced diurnal activity of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity remains a possibility.


1 Supported by National Science Foundation grant DMB 84-16981 to I.P.T.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jashsHome page
I. Weiss, Y. Mizrahi, and E. Raveh
Synergistic Effects of Elevated CO2 and Fertilization on Net CO2 Uptake and Growth of the CAM Plant Hylocereus undatus
J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., May 1, 2009; 134(3): 364 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. Ceusters, A. M. Borland, E. Londers, V. Verdoodt, C. Godts, and M. P. De Proft
Diel Shifts in Carboxylation Pathway and Metabolite Dynamics in the CAM Bromeliad Aechmea 'Maya' in Response to Elevated CO2
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2008; 102(3): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
U. LUTTGE
Ecophysiology of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM)
Ann. Bot., June 1, 2004; 93(6): 629 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists