Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 84:251-254 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Plant Morphological and Biochemical Responses to Field Water Deficits 1

II. Responses of Leaf Glycerolipid Composition in Cotton

Richard F. Wilson, John J. Burke and Jerry E. Quisenberry

United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Soybean and Nitrogen Fixation Research Unit, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Plant Stress and Water Conservation Research Unit, Texas Tech. University, Lubbock, Texas

The effects of water deficits on leaf glycerolipid composition were analyzed in two photoperiodic strains of field grown cotton (Gossypium kirsutum L.) that differ in sensitivity to drought. Leaves from plants grown under dryland conditions exhibited increased dry weight and specific leaf weight. The average midday leaf water potential in the dryland treatment decreased to –1.9 and –2.4 megapascals, respectively, for the T25 and T185 genotypes. Total leaf lipid content of plants exposed to dryland conditions was 5.9 and 7.5% of leaf dry weight for strain T25 and T185, respectively. The difference in leaf lipid content between these genotypes was caused by water deficits and was attributed to loss of both phospholipids and glycolipids in strain T25. There was no apparent loss of phospholipids due to water deficits in the T185 genotype; however, a significant loss of glycolipids was partially compensated by a 2-fold increase in triacylglycerol. No change in triacylglycerol was found between treatments in T25 leaves. Water deficit caused a significant decline in the relative degree of acylunsaturation in phospholipids and glycolipids from both genotypes; however, the double bond index for triacylglycerol increased in both genotypes. It is believed that the observed responses of leaf lipid composition to dryland conditions may be an additional criterion for characterization and selection of new drought-tolerant cotton genotypes.


1 Cooperative investigations of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service and the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service at Raleigh, NC and Lubbock, TX. Paper No. 10566 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7601.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
W. T. Pettigrew
Physiological Consequences of Moisture Deficit Stress in Cotton
Crop Sci., July 1, 2004; 44(4): 1265 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Porfirova, E. Bergmuller, S. Tropf, R. Lemke, and P. Dormann
Isolation of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking vitamin E and identification of a cyclase essential for all tocopherol biosynthesis
PNAS, September 17, 2002; 99(19): 12495 - 12500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists