Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 84:1132-1138 (1987)
© 1987 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (62)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pharis, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mander, L. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pharis, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mander, L. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pharis, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mander, L. N.
Development and Growth Regulation

Gibberellins, Endogenous and Applied, in Relation to Flower Induction in the Long-Day Plant Lolium temulentum1

Richard P. Pharis, Lloyd T. Evans, Rod W. King and Lewis N. Mander

Plant Physiology Research Group, Department of Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4, CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia, Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601 Australia

Changes in endogenous gibberellin-like substances (GAs) and related compounds in the shoot apices of Lolium temulentum during and after flower induction by one long day was examined for plants grown in three consecutive years. The total GA level in the shoot apical tissue was high (up to 42 micrograms per gram dry weight, or 3 x 10–5 molar GA3 equivalents), increasing several-fold on the day after the long day and then declining. Of the many GA-like substances present, the putative polyhydroxylated components—with HPLC retention times between those of GA8 (three hydroxyls) and GA32 (four hydroxyls), and accounting for about a quarter of the total GA activity—were most consistent and striking in their changes. Their level in the apices increased 3- to 5-fold on the day after the long day and then subsided. When various GAs were applied to plants in noninductive short days, flower initiation was induced by several, most notably by GA32, GA5, 2,2-dimethyl GA4, GA3, and GA7. GA32 was most like one long day in eliciting a strong flowering response while having little effect on stem growth, whereas GA1 had the opposite effect. It is suggested that highly hydroxylated C-19 GAs may play a central role in the induction of flowering in this long-day plant.


1 Supported in part by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Operating and International Collaborative Grants (A 2585 and IC-0211 to R. P. P.)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
Y. Kobayashi and D. Weigel
Move on up, it's time for change mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering
Genes & Dev., October 1, 2007; 21(19): 2371 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. Gallego-Giraldo, J. L. Garcia-Martinez, T. Moritz, and I. Lopez-Diaz
Flowering in Tobacco Needs Gibberellins but is not Promoted by the Levels of Active GA1 and GA4 in the Apical Shoot
Plant Cell Physiol., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 897 - 898.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
L. Gallego-Giraldo, J. L. Garcia-Martinez, T. Moritz, and I. Lopez-Diaz
Flowering in Tobacco Needs Gibberellins but is not Promoted by the Levels of Active GA1 and GA4 in the Apical Shoot
Plant Cell Physiol., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 615 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. A. Blazquez, M. Trenor, and D. Weigel
Independent Control of Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Flowering Time by the Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2002; 130(4): 1770 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. W. King, T. Moritz, L. T. Evans, O. Junttila, and A. J. Herlt
Long-Day Induction of Flowering in Lolium temulentum Involves Sequential Increases in Specific Gibberellins at the Shoot Apex
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2001; 127(2): 624 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. B. Scott, W. Jin, H. K. Ledford, H.-S. Jung, and M. A. Honma
EAF1 Regulates Vegetative-Phase Change and Flowering Time in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, July 1, 1999; 120(3): 675 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
G. F.W. Gocal, A. T. Poole, F. Gubler, R. J. Watts, C. Blundell, and R. W. King
Long-Day Up-Regulation of a GAMYB Gene during Lolium temulentum Inflorescence Formation
Plant Physiology, April 1, 1999; 119(4): 1271 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A Telfer, K. Bollman, and R. Poethig
Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana
Development, January 2, 1997; 124(3): 645 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. K. Okamuro, B. G. W. den Boer, C. Lotys-Prass, W. Szeto, and K. D. Jofuku
Flowers into shoots: Photo and hormonal control of a meristem identity switch in Arabidopsis
PNAS, November 26, 1996; 93(24): 13831 - 13836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. McDaniel and L. Hartnett
Flowering as metamorphosis: two sequential signals regulate floral initiation in Lolium temulentum
Development, January 11, 1996; 122(11): 3661 - 3668.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society of Plant Biologists