This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (58) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stuhlfauth, T. Articles by Fock, H. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stuhlfauth, T. Articles by Fock, H. P. Agricola Articles by Stuhlfauth, T. Articles by Fock, H. P.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Fluorescence Quenching and Gas Exchange in a Water Stressed C₃ Plant, Digitalis lanata

Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, D-6750 Kaiserslautern, Federal Republic of Germany

A leaf cuvette has been adapted for use with a pulse-modulation fluorometer and an open gas exchange system. Leaf water potential () was decreased by withholding watering from Digitalis lanata EHRH. plants. At different stages of water deficiency the photochemical (q_Q) and nonphotochemical (q_E) fluorescence quenching was determined during the transition between darkness and light-induced steady state photosynthesis of the attached leaves. In addition, the steady state CO₂ and H₂O gas exchange was recorded. Following a decrease of leaf water potential with increasing water deficiency, the transition of photochemical quenching was almost unaffected, whereas nonphotochemical quenching increased. This is indicative of an enhanced thylakoid membrane energization during the transition and is interpreted as a partial inhibition of either the ATP generating or the ATP consuming reaction sequences. Complete reversion of the stress induced changes was achieved within 6 hours after rewatering. In contrast to the variations during transition, the final steady state values of q_Q and q_E remained unchanged over the entire stress range from –0.7 to –2.5 megapascals. From these results we conclude that, once established, electron transport via photosystem II and the transmembrane proton gradient remain unaffected by water stress. These data are indicative of a protective mechanism against photoinhibition during stress, when net CO₂ uptake is limited.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Shirke and U. V. Pathre Influence of leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in Prosopis juliflora J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2004; 55(405): 2111 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]