Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 86:967-970 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tremolieres, A.
Right arrow Articles by Connan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tremolieres, A.
Right arrow Articles by Connan, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tremolieres, A.
Right arrow Articles by Connan, A.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Variation of Transhexadecenoic Acid Content in Two Triazine Resistant Mutants of Chenopodium album and Their Susceptible Progenitor

A. Tremolieres, H. Darmency, J. Gasquez, M. Dron and A. Connan

Institute de Physiologie Végétale, CNRS, 91190 Gif sur Yvette, France, I.N.R.A. Laboratoire de Malherbologie, BV 1540, 21034 Dijon Cédex, France, Plant Biology Laboratory. The Salk Institute, P.O. Box 85800, San Diego, California 92138-9216

Two atrazine resistant nutants of Chenopodium album L. and their susceptible progenitor were analyzed for lipid composition. In the phosphatidyldiacylglycerol the {Delta}3-trans-hexadecenoic acid (C16:1 trans) percentage was higher in the two resistant phenotypes. However, this difference appears later in the development of the leaves and is not clearly observed in young leaves and seedlings. Thus, the increase of the C16:1 trans during the leaf development of the resistant phenotypes is probably a secondary effect of the psbA mutation that arises in compensation for some photosynthesis deficiency. The significance of the lipid differences shown between the two resistant mutants is discussed in terms of whether they are responsible of the two different levels of herbicide resistance observed in the field.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Plant Biologists