This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (40) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parkhurst, D. F. Articles by Cowan, I. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Parkhurst, D. F. Articles by Cowan, I. R. Agricola Articles by Parkhurst, D. F. Articles by Cowan, I. R.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Gradients of Intercellular CO₂ Levels Across the Leaf Mesophyll ¹

School of Public and Environmental Affairs and Biology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana 47405, Department of Environmental Biology, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra City, A. C. T. 2601, Australia

Most current photosynthesis models, and interpretations of many wholeleaf CO₂ gas exchange measurements, are based on the often unstated assumption that the partial pressure of CO₂ is nearly uniform throughout the airspaces of the leaf mesophyll. Here we present measurements of CO₂ gradients across amphistomatous leaves allowed to assimilate CO₂ through only one surface, thus simulating hypostomatous leaves. We studied five species: Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng., Brassica chinensis L., Gossypium hirsutum L., Phaseolus vulgaris L., and Spinacia oleracea L. For Eucalyptus, maximum CO₂ pressure differences across the leaf mesophyll were 73 and 160 microbar when the pressures outside the lower leaf surface were 310 and 590 microbar, respectively. Using an approximate theoretical calculation, we infer that if the CO₂ had been supplied equally at both surfaces then the respective mean intercellular CO₂ pressures would have been roughly 12 and 27 microbar less than the pressures in the substomatal cavities in these cases. For ambient CO₂ pressures near 320 microbar, the average and minimum pressure differences across the mesophyll were 45 and 13 microbar. The corresponding mean intercellular CO₂ pressures would then be roughly 8 and 2 microbar less than those in the substomatal cavities. Pressure differences were generally smaller for the four agricultural species than for Eucalyptus, but they were nevertheless larger than previously reported values.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Terashima, Y. T. Hanba, Y. Tazoe, P. Vyas, and S. Yano Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 343 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I.L. Morison, E. Gallouet, T. Lawson, G. Cornic, R. Herbin, and N. R. Baker Lateral Diffusion of CO2 in Leaves Is Not Sufficient to Support Photosynthesis Plant Physiology, September 1, 2005; 139(1): 254 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. TERASHIMA, T. ARAYA, S.-I. MIYAZAWA, K. SONE, and S. YANO Construction and Maintenance of the Optimal Photosynthetic Systems of the Leaf, Herbaceous Plant and Tree: an Eco-developmental Treatise Ann. Bot., February 1, 2005; 95(3): 507 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. RHIZOPOULOU and G. K. PSARAS Development and Structure of Drought-tolerant Leaves of the Mediterranean Shrub Capparis spinosa L. Ann. Bot., September 1, 2003; 92(3): 377 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sun and J. N. Nishio Why Abaxial Illumination Limits Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation in Spinach Leaves Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2001; 42(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]