Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 86:1163-1167 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matyssek, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matyssek, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matyssek, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, J. S.
Development and Growth Regulation

Rapid Wall Relaxation in Elongating Tissues 1

Rainer Matyssek2, Sachio Maruyama3 and John S. Boyer4

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843

Reported differences in the relaxation of cell walls in enlarging stem tissues of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) cause measurements of the yield threshold turgor, an important growth parameter, to be in doubt. Using the pressure probe and guillotine psychrometer, we investigated wall relaxation in these species by excising the elongating tissue in air to remove the water supply. We found that the rapid kinetics usually exhibited by soybean could be delayed and made similar to the slow kinetics previously reported for pea if slowly growing or mature tissue was left attached to the rapidly growing tissue when relaxation was initiated. The greater the amount of attached tissue, the slower the relaxation, suggesting that slowly growing tissue acted as a water source. Consistent with this concept was a lower water potential in the rapidly elongating tissue than in the slowly growing tissue. Previous reports of wall relaxation in pea included slowly growing tissue. If this tissue was removed from pea, relaxation became as rapid as usually exhibited by soybean. It is concluded that the true relaxation of cell walls to the yield threshold requires only a few minutes and that the yield threshold should be constant during so short a time, thus reflecting the yield threshold in the intact plant before excision. Under these conditions, the yield threshold was close to the turgor in the intact plant regardless of the species. The presence of slowly growing or mature tissue delays wall relaxation and should be avoided during such measurements. However, this delay can be used to advantage when turgor of intact growing tissues is being measured using excised tissues because turgor does not change for a considerable time after excision.


2 Present address: Swiss Federal Institute of Forestry Research, CH8903 Birmensdorf ZH, Switzerland.

3 Present address: Environmental Stress Physiology Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology, National Institute of Agrobiological Resources, Tsukuba Science City, Yatabe, Ibaraki 305, Japan.

4 Present address: College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958.

1 Contribution of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, paper No. 23103 in the technical article series. Partial support for this work was also provided by grants from the Fulbright Commission (R. M.), Government of Japan (S. M.), and the Department of Energy grant DE-FG05-84ER13273 (J. S. B.)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. E. Proseus and J. S. Boyer
Identifying cytoplasmic input to the cell wall of growing Chara corallina
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3231 - 3242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Fricke, G. Akhiyarova, W. Wei, E. Alexandersson, A. Miller, P. O. Kjellbom, A. Richardson, T. Wojciechowski, L. Schreiber, D. Veselov, et al.
The short-term growth response to salt of the developing barley leaf
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(5): 1079 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Fricke, G. Akhiyarova, D. Veselov, and G. Kudoyarova
Rapid and tissue-specific changes in ABA and in growth rate in response to salinity in barley leaves
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2004; 55(399): 1115 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. S. Boyer
Growth-induced water potentials originate from wall yielding during growth
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2001; 52(360): 1483 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. C. Hsiao and L.-K. Xu
Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2000; 51(350): 1595 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Plant Biologists