Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 86:1240-1246 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, J. L.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Cytoplasmic Distribution of Heat Shock Proteins in Soybean 1

Michael A. Mansfield2 and Joe L. Key

Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

Previous analyses of the distribution of heat shock (hs) proteins in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr., var Wayne) have demonstrated that a fraction of the low molecular weight hs protein associates with ribosomes during hs. To more specifically characterize the nature of this association, isokinetic centrifugation of ribosomes through sucrose gradients was used to separate monosomes from polysomes. The present analysis demonstrated that hs proteins were bound to polysomes but not monosomes. Treatment of polysomes with puromycin, K+, and Mg2+, which caused dissociation of ribosomes into 40S and 60S subunits, also caused dissociation of the hs proteins. Using the procedure of Nover et al. (1983, Mol. Cell Biol, 3: 1628-1655), a hs granule fraction was also isolated. As in tomato cells, hs granules from soybean seedlings contained the low molecular weight hs proteins as a primary component and a number of other non-hs proteins of relative molecular mass 30 to 40 kilodaltons and 70 to 90 kilodaltons. On metrizamide gradients they exhibited a buoyant density of 1.20 to 1.21 grams per cubic centimeter, typical of ribonucleoprotein particles. Heat shock granules were characterized as unique cytoplasmic particles based on protein composition and buoyant density. Isopycnic centrifugation of ribosome preparations demonstrated that they contained hs granules, but the hs proteins bound to polysomes were not released by KCI/EDTA treatment. Thus, the polysome-bound hs proteins and the granule-bound hs proteins appear to represent two distinct populations of hs proteins in the cytoplasm. Heat shock granules were not distinguishable from ribosomes at the level of resolution used in transmission electron microscopy.


2 Current address: MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312.

1 Supported through Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AS09-80ER10678 to Joe L. Key.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Plant Biologists