Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 87:280-285 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kenerley, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Kenerley, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kenerley, C. M.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Cotton Fleahopper and Associated Microorganisms as Components in the Production of Stress Ethylene by Cotton 1

William R. Martin, Jr.2, Page W. Morgan, Winfield L. Sterling and Charles M. Kenerley

Department of Entomology, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

Excised cotton terminal buds incubated with adults or nymphs of the cotton fleahopper (CFH), Pseudatomoscelis seriatus (Reuter), produced ethylene at theoretical abscission-inducing rates by 24 h after introduction of the insect. Inoculation of cotton shoot tips with three microorganisms commonly associated with CFH and cotton in all cases promoted ethylene production to theoretical abscission-inducing rates by 24 h after inoculation. CFH alone or injection of microorganisms consistently caused cotton shoot tips to darken and become soft. These changes paralleled the rise in ethylene production and did not occur in control shoot tips. Of the three microorganisms, Xanthomonas campestris pv malvacearum (Smith) Dye (XCM) produced little ethylene when grown in culture, while the two fungi, Penicillium purpurogenum Stoll and P. glabrum (Wehmer) Westling, produced higher levels. The parallel between plant response to CFH, XCM, and CFH + XCM suggests a similar mechanism of ethylene induction by these two stress agents. Since a portion of the CFH were devoid of microorganisms, yet their impact on ethylene production by cotton tissue was uniform, we propose that the primary mechanism of ethylene induction involves the insect's salivary fluids which contain cell wall hydrolyzing enzymes.


2 Present Address: USDA-ARS, Pest Management Research Unit, P.O. Drawer DG, College Station, TX 77841.

1 Approved for publication as TA 22787 by Director, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Plant Biologists