This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (30) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sauerbrey, E. Articles by Jung, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sauerbrey, E. Articles by Jung, J. Agricola Articles by Sauerbrey, E. Articles by Jung, J.

Development and Growth Regulation

Ethylene Production by Sunflower Cell Suspensions ¹

Effects of Plant Growth Retardants

BASF Agricultural Research Centre, P. O. Box 220, D-6703 Limburgerhof, Federal Republic of Germany

From a variety of undifferentiated plant cell suspensions, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-dependent cells of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. Spanners Allzweck) produced large quantities of ethylene. The maximum rate was about 1 nanomole x gram fresh weight^–1 x hour^–1 during the exponential growth phase. The action of various compounds known to interfere with ethylene formation in plant tissue was studied in sunflower cell suspensions. The influence on ethylene, 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid (ACC), and N-malonyl-ACC (MACC) levels suggested that the final steps in ethylene synthesis resemble those of other plant systems. This makes sunflower cells suitable for analyzing the effects of biologically active compounds on cellular ethylene biosynthesis. In particular, plant growth retardants of the norbornenodiazetine and triazole type inhibited ethylene production of sunflower cells. On the other hand, the ACC level was considerably elevated while that of MACC did not change significantly. It is assumed that the conversion of ACC to ethylene catalyzed by the ethylene-forming enzyme was influenced.