Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 88:375-378 (1988)
© 1988 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (37)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vu, J. C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Yelenosky, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vu, J. C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Yelenosky, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vu, J. C. V.
Right arrow Articles by Yelenosky, G.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Water Deficit and Associated Changes in Some Photosynthetic Parameters in Leaves of `Valencia' Orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck)

Joseph C. V. Vu and George Yelenosky

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2120 Camden Road, Orlando, Florida 32803, Horticultural Research Laboratory, 2120 Camden Road, Orlando, Florida 32803

Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, transpiration, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCase), and soluble protein were reduced in leaves of water-deficit (stress) `Valencia' orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck). Maximum photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and transpiration, which occurred before midday for both control and stressed plants, was 58 and 40%, respectively, for the stress (–2.0 megapascals leaf water potential) as compared to the control (–0.6 megapascals leaf water potential). As water deficit became more severe in the afternoon, with water potential of –3.1 megapascals for the stressed leaves vs. –1.1 megapascals for control leaves, stressed-leaf transpiration declined and photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rapidly dropped to zero. Water deficit decreased both activation and total activity of RuBPCase. Activation of the enzyme was about 62% (of fully activated enzyme in vitro) for the stress, compared to 80% for the control. Water deficit reduced RuBPCase initial activity by 40% and HCO3/Mg2+-saturated activity by 22%. However, RuBPCase for both stressed and control leaves were similar in Kcat (25 moles CO2 per mole enzyme per second) and Km for CO2 (18.9 micromolar). Concentrations of RuBPCase and soluble protein of stressed leaves averaged 80 and 85%, respectively, of control leaves. Thus, reductions in activation and concentration of RuBPCase in Valencia orange leaves contributed to reductions in enzyme activities during water-deficit periods. Declines in leaf photosynthesis, soluble protein, and RuBPCase activation and concentration due to water deficit were, however, recoverable at 5 days after rewatering.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
J. FLEXAS and H. MEDRANO
Drought-inhibition of Photosynthesis in C3 Plants: Stomatal and Non-stomatal Limitations Revisited
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2002; 89(2): 183 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society of Plant Biologists