Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 89:293-298 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laskowski, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laskowski, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Laskowski, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, W. R.
Development and Growth Regulation

Regulation of Pea Epicotyl Elongation by Blue Light 1

Fluence-Response Relationships and Growth Distribution

Marta J. Laskowski and Winslow R. Briggs

Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California 94305

Irradiation with blue light causes a rapid decrease in stem elongation in Pisum sativum. Growing plants under continuous red light allowed us to study the fluence dependence and spatial distribution of blue-induced growth effects without interference from large changes in the ratio of the far-red absorbing form of phytochrome to total phytochrome. The magnitude of the inhibition generated by a 30-second pulse of blue light was linearly related to the log of the fluence applied over two orders of magnitude. Reciprocity held for irradiations with a pulse length shorter than the lag time for the response. The spatial distribution of inhibition was studied by marking the growing zone and photographing the stem at 10-minute intervals before, during, and after a 1-hour exposure to blue light. The region just below the hook does not undergo any perceptible change in growth rate while growth is nearly 100% inhibited in the base of the third internode.


1 Carnegie Institution of Washington Department of Plant Biology Publication No. 1012. M. J. L. was supported by a National Science Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
K. Haga and M. Iino
Asymmetric distribution of auxin correlates with gravitropism and phototropism but not with autostraightening (autotropism) in pea epicotyls
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(4): 837 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. Long and M. Iino
Light-Dependent Osmoregulation in Pea Stem Protoplasts. Photoreceptors, Tissue Specificity, Ion Relationships, and Physiological Implications
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 1854 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. M. Parks, M. H. Cho, and E. P. Spalding
Two Genetically Separable Phases of Growth Inhibition Induced by Blue Light in Arabidopsis Seedlings
Plant Physiology, October 1, 1998; 118(2): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists