Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 89:403-408 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Servaites, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fondy, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Servaites, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fondy, B. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Servaites, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fondy, B. R.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Leaf Carbon Metabolism and Metabolite Levels during a Period of Sinusoidal Light 1

Jerome C. Servaites, Donald R. Geiger, Michelle A. Tucci and Bernadette R. Fondy

Department of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469, Department of Biology, Seton Hill College, Greensburg, Pennsylvania 15601

Photosynthesis rate, internal CO2 concentration, starch, sucrose, and metabolite levels were measured in leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) during a 14-h period of sinusoidal light, which simulated a natural light period. Photosynthesis rate closely followed increasing and decreasing light level. Chloroplast metabolite levels changed in a manner indicating differential activation of enzymes at different light levels. Starch levels declined during the first and last 2 hours of the photoperiod, but increased when photosynthesis rate was greater than 50% of maximal. Sucrose and sucrose phosphate synthase levels were constant during the photoperiod, which is consistent with a relatively steady rate of sucrose synthesis during the day as observed previously (BR Fondy et al. [1989] Plant Physiol 89: 396-402). When starch was being degraded, glucose 1-phosphate level was high and there was a large amount of glucose 6-phosphate above that in equilibrium with fructose 6-phosphate, while fructose 6-phosphate and triose-phosphate levels were very low. Likewise, the regulatory metabolite, fructose, 2,6-bisphosphate was high, indicating that little carbon could move to sucrose from starch by the triose-phosphate pathway. These data cast doubt upon the feasibility of significant carbon flow through the triose-phosphate pathway during starch degradation and support the need for an additional pathway for mobilizing starch carbon to sucrose.


1 Supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (DMB-83-03957), U.S. Department of Agriculture Competitive Research Grants Office (86-CRCR-1-2093), and the American Philosophical Society.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. Hauschild and A. von Schaewen
Differential Regulation of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Isoenzyme Activities in Potato
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2003; 133(1): 47 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
J. C. Servaites and D. R. Geiger
Kinetic characteristics of chloroplast glucose transport
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2002; 53(374): 1581 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Weber, J. C. Servaites, D. R. Geiger, H. Kofler, D. Hille, F. Gröner, U. Hebbeker, and U.-I. Flügge
Identification, Purification, and Molecular Cloning of a Putative Plastidic Glucose Translocator
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2000; 12(5): 787 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists