Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 90:648-652 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wedding, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wedding, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wedding, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, C. R.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Activation of Higher Plant Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylases by Glucose-6-Phosphate 1

Randolph T. Wedding, M. Kay Black and Christopher R. Meyer

Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521

Studies of the response of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from C3 (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.]), C4 (maize [Zea mays L.]), and Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) (Crassula) leaves to the activator glucose-6-phosphate as a function of pH showed that the binding of the activator and the response path to activation were essentially identical for all three enzymes. The level of affinity for the activator differed, with the CAM enzyme having the highest affinity and the maize enzyme the lowest. The observed pK values suggest that histidine and cysteine groups may be involved in activation by glucose-6-phosphate. The presence of glucose-6-phosphate protected the enzyme against inactivation of the activation response by p-chloromercuribenzoate. The maximal activation response to glucose-6-phosphate showed differences among the three enzymes including different pH optima and different pH profiles. Here the maize leaf enzyme showed a potential response about twice as great as that of the C3 and CAM enzymes.


1 Supported in part by National Science Foundation grant DMB 85-15181.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists