Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 90:657-664 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ort, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ort, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ort, D. R.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Photophosphorylation after Chilling in the Light 1

Effects on Membrane Energization and Coupling Factor Activity

Robert R. Wise and Donald R. Ort

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Illinois, 289 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, 289 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801

The response of in situ photophosphorylation in attached cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv Ashley) leaves to chilling under strong illumination was investigated. A single-beam kinetic spectrophotometer fitted with a clamp-on, whole leaf cuvette was used to measure the flash-induced electrochromic absorbance change at 518 minus 540 nanometers ({Delta}A518–540) in attached leaves. The relaxation kinetics of the electric field-indicating {Delta}A518–540 measures the rate of depolarization of the thylakoid membrane. Since this depolarization process is normally dominated by proton efflux through the coupling factor during ATP synthesis, this technique can be used, in conjuction with careful controls, as a monitor of in situ ATP formation competence. Whole, attached leaves were chilled at 5°C and 1000 microeinsteins per square meter per second for up to 6 hours then rewarmed in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes and 100% relative humidity. Leaf water potential, chlorophyll content, and the effective optical pathlength for the absorption measurements were not affected by the treatment. Light- and CO2-saturated leaf disc oxygen evolution and the quantum efficiency of photosynthesis were inhibited by approximately 50% after 3 hours of light chilling and by approximately 75% after 6 hours. Despite the large inhibition to net photosynthesis, the measurements of {Delta}A518–540 relaxation kinetics showed photophosphorylation to be largely unaffected by the chilling and light exposure. The amplitude of the {Delta}A518-540 measures the degree of energization of the photosynthetic membranes and was reduced significantly by chilling in the light. The cause of the decreased energization was traced to impaired turnover of photosystem II. Our measurements showed that the chilling of whole leaves in the light caused neither an uncoupling of photophosphorylation from photosynthetic electron transport nor any irreversible inhibition of the chloroplast coupling factor in situ. The sizeable inhibition in net photosynthesis observed after chilling in the light cannot, therefore, be attributed to any direct effect on photophosphorylation competence.


1 Supported in part by U.S. Department of Agriculture Competitive Research Grant 87-CRCR-1-2381.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. Dutta, S. Mohanty, and B. C. Tripathy
Role of Temperature Stress on Chloroplast Biogenesis and Protein Import in Pea
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2009; 150(2): 1050 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists