Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 90:814-819 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (116)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Terry, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Terry, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rao, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Terry, N.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Leaf Phosphate Status, Photosynthesis, and Carbon Partitioning in Sugar Beet

I. Changes in Growth, Gas Exchange, and Calvin Cycle Enzymes

I. Madhusudana Rao and Norman Terry

Department of Plant and Soil Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L. cv F58-554H1) were cultured hydroponically for 2 weeks in growth chambers with two levels of orthophosphate (Pi) supplied in half strength Hoagland solution. Low-P plants were supplied with 1/20th of the Pi supplied to control plants. With low-P treatment, the acid soluble leaf phosphate and total leaf P decreased by about 88%. Low-P treatment had a much greater effect on leaf area than on photosynthesis. Low-P decreased total leaf area by 76%, dry weight per plant by 60%, and the rate of photosynthesis per area at light saturation by 35%. Low-P treatment significantly decreased the total extractable activity of phosphoglycerate kinase (by 18%) and NADP-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (by 16%), but did not decrease the total activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylase (RuBPCase) and ribulose-5-phosphate kinase. Low-P treatment decreased the initial activities of three rate-limiting Calvin cycle enzymes, but had no effect on the initial activity of RuBPCase. Furthermore, low-P treatment significantly increased the total extractable activities of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (by 61%), fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (by 53%), and transketolase (by 46%). The results suggest that low-P treatment affected photosynthetic rate through an effect on RuBP regeneration rather than through RuBPCase activity and that the changes in Calvin cycle enzymes with low-P resulted in an increased flow of carbon to starch.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. Wissuwa, G. Gamat, and A. M. Ismail
Is root growth under phosphorus deficiency affected by source or sink limitations?
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2005; 56(417): 1943 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. C. de Groot, R. van den Boogaard, L. F. M. Marcelis, J. Harbinson, and H. Lambers
Contrasting effects of N and P deprivation on the regulation of photosynthesis in tomato plants in relation to feedback limitation
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2003; 54(389): 1957 - 1967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
A. J. Pieters, M. J. Paul, and D. W. Lawlor
Low sink demand limits photosynthesis under Pi deficiency
J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2001; 52(358): 1083 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. Pellerin, A. Mollier, and D. Plénet
Phosphorus Deficiency Affects the Rate of Emergence and Number of Maize Adventitious Nodal Roots
Agron. J., July 1, 2000; 92(4): 690 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists