This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seemann, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seemann, J. R. Agricola Articles by Seemann, J. R.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Light Adaptation/Acclimation of Photosynthesis and the Regulation of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Activity in Sun and Shade Plants ¹

Department of Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557

The consequences of light adaptation and acclimation of photosynthesis on photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), particularly as it relates to the efficiency of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) use in photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation, was studied in the sun species Glycine max and the shade species Alocasia macrorrhiza. Both G. max and A. macrorrhiza were found to possess the capacity for light acclimation of CO₂ assimilation, but over distinctly different ranges of photon flux density (PFD). For each species, light acclimation of photosynthesis had little effect on the rate of photosynthesis per unit Rubisco protein or the light response of Rubisco carbamylation and CA 1P metabolism. In contrast, photosynthesis per unit Rubisco protein was significantly higher in G. max than in A. macrorrhiza, due in part to a lower total (fully carbamylated) molar activity (activity per unit enzyme) of A. macrorrhiza Rubisco than that of G. max. Comparison of the light response of Rubisco regulatory mechanisms between G. max and A. macrorrhiza indicated some degree of adaptation, such that carbamylation was higher and CA 1P levels lower at lower PFDs in the shade species than the sun species. However, this adjustment was not sufficient for Rubisco in low light grown A. macrorrhiza to be fully active at the growth PFD. Photosynthesis in A. macrorrhiza appeared to become RuBP regeneration-limited at lower PFDs than G. max, and this was probably the determinant of the light saturated rate of photosynthesis in the shade species. The low efficiency of Rubisco use in A. macrorrhiza was a major contributing factor to its five- to sixfold lower photosynthetic NUE than G. max. Shade species such as A. macrorrhiza appear to make far from maximal use of Rubisco protein N.