Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 91:542-551 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (137)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilger, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thayer, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilger, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thayer, S. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bilger, W.
Right arrow Articles by Thayer, S. S.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Light-Induced Spectral Absorbance Changes in Relation to Photosynthesis and the Epoxidation State of Xanthophyll Cycle Components in Cotton Leaves 1

Wolfgang Bilger, Olle Björkman and Susan S. Thayer

Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California 94305, Department of Plant Biology, Stanford, California 94305

When cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L., cv Acaia SJC-1) leaves kept in weak light were suddenly exposed to strong red actinic light a spectral absorbance change took place having the following prominent characteristics. (a) It was irreversible within the first four minute period after darkening. (b) The difference in leaf absorbance between illuminated and predarkened leaves had a major peak at 505 nanometers, a minor peak at 465 nanometers, a shoulder around 515 nanometers, and minor troughs at 455 and 480 nanometers. (c) On the basis of its spectral and kinetic characteristics this absorbance change can be readily distinguished from the much faster electrochromic shift which has a peak at 515 nanometers, from the slow, so-called light-scattering change which has a broad peak centered around 535 nanometers and is reversed upon darkening, and from absorbance changes associated with light-induced chloroplast rearrangements. (d) The extent and time course of this absorbance change closely matched that of the deepoxidation of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin in the same leaves. (e) Both the absorbance change and the ability to form zeaxanthin were completely blocked in leaves to which dithiothreitol (DTT) had been provided through the cut petlole. DTT treatment also caused strong inhibition of that component of the 535-nanometer absorbance change which is reversed in less than 4 minutes upon darkening and considered to be caused by increased light scattering. Moreover, DTT inhibited a large part of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in the presence of excessive light. However, DTT had no detectable effect on the photon yield of photosynthesis measured under strictly rate-limiting photon flux densities or on the light-saturated photosynthetic capacity, at least in the short term. We conclude that it is possible to monitor light-induced violaxanthin de-epoxidation in green intact leaves by measurement of the absorbance change at 505 nanometers. Determination of absorbance changes in conjunction with measurements of photosynthesis in the presence and absence of DTT provide a system well suited for future studies of meachanisms of dissipation of excessive excitation energy in intact leaves.


1 C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 1025. This work was supported by Grant No. 86-CRCR-1-2054 of the Competitive Grants Program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to O. B. A Carnegie Institution Fellowship and a Feodor-Lynen-Fellowship by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation to W. B. is gratefully acknowledged.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. P. Johnson, M. L. Perez-Bueno, A. Zia, P. Horton, and A. V. Ruban
The Zeaxanthin-Independent and Zeaxanthin-Dependent qE Components of Nonphotochemical Quenching Involve Common Conformational Changes within the Photosystem II Antenna in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2009; 149(2): 1061 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Suzuki, K. Nagasuga, and M. Okada
The Chilling Injury Induced by High Root Temperature in the Leaves of Rice Seedlings
Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 433 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Y. Tang, X. Wen, Q. Lu, Z. Yang, Z. Cheng, and C. Lu
Heat Stress Induces an Aggregation of the Light-Harvesting Complex of Photosystem II in Spinach Plants
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 629 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-P. Li, A. M. Gilmore, S. Caffarri, R. Bassi, T. Golan, D. Kramer, and K. K. Niyogi
Regulation of Photosynthetic Light Harvesting Involves Intrathylakoid Lumen pH Sensing by the PsbS Protein
J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 22866 - 22874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
E. Delphin, J.-C. Duval, A.-L. Etienne, and D. Kirilovsky
Delta pH-Dependent Photosystem II Fluorescence Quenching Induced by Saturating, Multiturnover Pulses in Red Algae
Plant Physiology, September 1, 1998; 118(1): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
K. K. Niyogi, A. R. Grossman, and O. Björkman
Arabidopsis Mutants Define a Central Role for the Xanthophyll Cycle in the Regulation of Photosynthetic Energy Conversion
PLANT CELL, July 1, 1998; 10(7): 1121 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
U. Feller, S. J. Crafts-Brandner, and M. E. Salvucci
Moderately High Temperatures Inhibit Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase (Rubisco) Activase-Mediated Activation of Rubisco
Plant Physiology, February 1, 1998; 116(2): 539 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists