Plant Physiology 91:719-726 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists
Environmental and Stress Physiology
Axial and Radial Hydraulic Resistance to Roots of Maize (Zea mays L.) 1
Jürgen Frensch and
Ernst Steudle
Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenökologie, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstr. 30, D-8580 Bayreuth, Federal Republic of Germany
A root pressure probe was employed to measure hydraulic properties of primary roots of maize (Zea mays L.). The hydraulic conductivity (Lpr) of intact root segments was determined by applying gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic pressure across the root cylinder. In hydrostatic experiments, Lpr was constant along the segment except for an apical zone of approximately 20 millimeters in length which was hydraulically isolated due to a high axial resistance. In osmotic experiments, Lpr decreased toward the base of the roots. Lpr (osmotic) was significantly smaller than Lpr (hydrostatic). At various distances from the root tip, the axial hydraulic resistance per unit root length (Rx) was measured either by perfusing excised root segments or was estimated according to Poiseuille's law from cross-sections. The calculated Rx was smaller than the measured Rx by a factor of 2 to 5. Axial resistance varied with the distance from the apex due to the differentiation of early metaxylem vessels. Except for the apical 20 millimeters, radial water movement was limiting water uptake into the root. This is important for the evaluation of Lpr of roots from root pressure relaxations. Stationary water uptake into the roots was modeled using measured values of axial and radial hydraulic resistances in order to work out profiles of axial water flow and xylem water potentials.
1 Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Sonderforschungsbereich 137.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. Bramley, N. C. Turner, D. W. Turner, and S. D. Tyerman
Roles of Morphology, Anatomy, and Aquaporins in Determining Contrasting Hydraulic Behavior of Roots
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2009;
150(1):
348 - 364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Knipfer and E. Steudle
Root hydraulic conductivity measured by pressure clamp is substantially affected by internal unstirred layers
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(8):
2071 - 2084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Brodribb, T. S. Feild, and G. J. Jordan
Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2007;
144(4):
1890 - 1898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. BLOOM, J. FRENSCH, and A. R. TAYLOR
Influence of Inorganic Nitrogen and pH on the Elongation of Maize Seminal Roots
Ann. Bot.,
May 1, 2006;
97(5):
867 - 873.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Skotheim and L. Mahadevan
Physical Limits and Design Principles for Plant and Fungal Movements
Science,
May 27, 2005;
308(5726):
1308 - 1310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Trifilo, A. Gasco, F. Raimondo, A. Nardini, and S. Salleo
Kinetics of recovery of leaf hydraulic conductance and vein functionality from cavitation-induced embolism in sunflower
J. Exp. Bot.,
October 1, 2003;
54(391):
2323 - 2330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Miyamoto, E. Steudle, T. Hirasawa, and R. Lafitte
Hydraulic conductivity of rice roots
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2001;
52(362):
1835 - 1846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Steudle
Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2000;
51(350):
1531 - 1542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. C. Hsiao and L.-K. Xu
Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2000;
51(350):
1595 - 1616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Brodribb and R. S. Hill
Increases in Water Potential Gradient Reduce Xylem Conductivity in Whole Plants. Evidence from a Low-Pressure Conductivity Method
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2000;
123(3):
1021 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
