Plant Physiology 91:862-867 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists
Environmental and Stress Physiology
Water Deficits and Reproduction in Maize 1
Response of the Reproductive Tissue to Water Deficits at Anthesis and Mid-Grain Fill
Mark E. Westgate and
Debra L. Thomson Grant
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service-MWA, Morris, Minnesota 56267,
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory and University of Minnesota, Morris, Minnesota 56267
Reproductive development in maize (Zea mays L.) is vulnerable to plant water deficits during anthesis but becomes less sensitive as reproduction progresses. To determine whether changes in tissue water status correlated with the change in sensitivity, we examined the water potential ( w), osmotic potential ( s), and turgor of reproductive tissues during a short-term water deficit imposed at anthesis or mid-grain fill. Plants were grown in controlled environments in soil. At anthesis, leaf, husk, silk, and ovary w of control plants was similar (0.5 to 0.65 megapascal) at midday. When water was withheld, w decreased to 1.75, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.0 megapascal in these tissues. Net water uptake by the ovaries was inhibited, but final dry weight, solute content, and total extractable carbohydrates were similar to the controls. At mid-grain fill, leaf, husk, grain, and embryo w of control plants were 0.55, 0.35, 0.75, and 0.80 megapascal at midday. When water was withheld, leaf and husk w decreased to 2.4 and 1.4 megapascal within 6 days. However, grain and embryo w remained within 0.15 megapascal of control values. The grain continued to accumulate dry matter despite a net loss of water and a reduction in total solute content. These results indicate that the response of the reproductive tissues to plant water deficits varies with stage of grain development. The maintenance of a favorable water status only after grain filling is under way may explain, at least in part, the high sensitivity to plant water deficits early in reproductive development and the decrease in sensitivity as reproduction progresses.
1 Supported in part by U.S. Department of Agriculture Competitive Grant No. 86-CRCR-1-2055 to M.E.W. Contribution from USDA-Agricultural Research Service-MWA, Morris, MN, in cooperation with the University of Minnesota West Central Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 16,397.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Boyer and M. E. Westgate
Grain yields with limited water
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 1, 2004;
55(407):
2385 - 2394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. Loecke, M. Liebman, C. A. Cambardella, and T. L. Richard
Corn Growth Responses to Composted and Fresh Solid Swine Manures
Crop Sci.,
January 1, 2004;
44(1):
177 - 184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-X. Yu and T. L. Setter
Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Placenta and Endosperm in Developing Maize Kernels in Response to Water Deficit
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2003;
131(2):
568 - 582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. WANG, S. MAMBELLI, and T. L. SETTER
Abscisic Acid Catabolism in Maize Kernels in Response to Water Deficit at Early Endosperm Development
Ann. Bot.,
November 1, 2002;
90(5):
623 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|