Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 91:1393-1401 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lebherz, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lebherz, H. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lebherz, H. G.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Structural Similarities between Spinach Chloroplast and Cytosolic Class I Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolases 1

Immunochemical and Amino-Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

James J. Marsh, Kenneth J. Wilson and Herbert G. Lebherz

Department of Chemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, Applied Biosystems Inc., 850 Lincoln Center Drive, Foster City, California 94404

Immunochemical studies using polyclonal antisera prepared individually against highly purified cytosolic and chloroplast spinach leaf (Spinacia oleracea) fructose bisphosphate aldolases showed significant cross reaction between both forms of spinach aldolase and their heterologous antisera. The individual cross reactions were estimated to be approximately 50% in both cases under conditions of antibody saturation using a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In contrast, the class I procaryotic aldolase from Mycobacterium smegmatis and the class II aldolase from yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) did not cross-react with either type of antiserum. The 29 residue long amino-terminal amino acid sequences of the procaryotic M. smegmatis and the spinach chloroplast aldolases were determined. Comparisons of these sequences with those of other aldolases showed that the amino-terminal primary structure of the chloroplast aldolase is much more similar to the amino-terminal structures of class I cytosolic eucaryotic aldolases than it is to the corresponding region of the M. smegmatis enzyme, especially in that region which forms the first "beta sheet" in the secondary structure of the eucaryotic aldolases. Moreover, results of a systematic comparison of the amino acid compositions of a number of diverse eucaryotic and procaryotic fructose bisphosphate aldolases further suggest that the chloroplast aldolase belongs to the eucaryotic rather than the procaryotic "family" of class I aldolases.


1 This work was supported, in part, by Research Grant GM 23045 from the National Institutes of Health.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists