This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tateno, M. Articles by Bae, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tateno, M. Articles by Bae, K. Agricola Articles by Tateno, M. Articles by Bae, K.

Environmental and Stress Physiology

Comparison of Lodging Safety Factor of Untreated and Succinic Acid 2,2-Dimethylhydrazide-Treated Shoots of Mulberry Tree ¹

Faculty of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo 183, Japan

This study examined the lodging resistance of mulberry tree (Morus bombycis Koidz. cv Kenmochi) shoots treated or not treated with succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide (SADH). The lodging safety factor, an indicator of lodging resistance, was defined as the ratio of critical lodging load to the leaf fresh weight observed, provided that the distribution of the critical lodging load along the stem was similar to that of the leaf fresh weight observed. The critical lodging load was experimentally estimated by loading weights onto the stems. In the untreated trees, the lodging safety factor was maintained at about 3.2. In the SADH-treated trees, the stem elongation was inhibited to about 80% of that in the untreated trees, and the percentage of shoot dry matter partitioned into the leaves was always larger than that of the untreated trees. This dwarfing of the stem caused by SADH increased the critical lodging load supported by the unit stem dry weight, while this large investment of materials in leaves increased the leaf fresh weight supported by the unit stem dry weight. Since the increments canceled each other, the lodging safety factor of the SADH-treated shoots was similar to that of the untreated ones. These results suggest that the shoot formation of the mulberry tree is controlled to maintain the lodging safety factor at a constant level.

¹ Supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 63760051) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Jaouen, T. Almeras, C. Coutand, and M. Fournier How to determine sapling buckling risk with only a few measurements Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1583 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Taneda and M. Tateno The criteria for biomass partitioning of the current shoot: water transport versus mechanical support Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2004; 91(12): 1949 - 1959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Niklas Computing factors of safety against wind-induced tree stem damage J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2000; 51(345): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Niklas and H Spatz Methods for calculating factors of safety for plant stems J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3273 - 3280. [Abstract] [PDF]