Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 92:514-519 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, S. K.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Photoinhibition Resistance in the Red Alga Porphyra perforata1

The Role of Photoinhibition Repair

Stephen K. Herbert

Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California 94305, Department of Plant Biology, Stanford, California 94305

Photoinhibition resistance exhibited by the high intertidal red alga Porphyra perforata relative to its subtidal congener Porphyra nereocystis was examined using the protein synthesis inhibitor chloramphenicol to separate the damage and repair components of photoinhibition. Under photoinhibitory conditions, the rates of both damage to and replacement of photoinhibition-sensitive proteins was much higher in P. nereocystis than in P. perforata. Thus, photoinhibition resistance in P. perforata appears to be due to a reduced rate of photoinhibition damage rather than to an accelerated rate of photoinhibition repair. Reduction of photoinhibition damage in P. perforata may be by means of biophysical processes which increase the radiationless decay of excitation to heat in photosystem II. Alternatively, the photoinhibition-sensitive proteins in P. perforata may have slight structural alterations that improve their stability or they may be protected by enzyme systems that quench radicals formed by overexcitation of photosystem II. Reduction of the damage component of photoinhibition is a reasonable way to limit photoinhibition in P. perforata during the severe desiccation and exposure to full sun that occur simultaneously during daily low tides, conditions under which the protein synthesis required for photoinhibition repair could not occur.


1 Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Plant Biology Publication No. 1041.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
D. J. Thomas, J. Thomas, P. A. Youderian, and S. K. Herbert
Photoinhibition and Light-Induced Cyclic Electron Transport in ndhB- and psaE- Mutants of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803
Plant Cell Physiol., August 1, 2001; 42(8): 803 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists