This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (66) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saftner, R. A. Articles by Baldi, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saftner, R. A. Articles by Baldi, B. G. Agricola Articles by Saftner, R. A. Articles by Baldi, B. G.

Metabolism and Enzymology

Polyamine Levels and Tomato Fruit Development: Possible Interaction with Ethylene

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, Plant Hormone Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, Maryland 20705

Fruits of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv Liberty, ripen slowly and have a prolonged keeping quality. Ethylene production and the levels of polyamines in pericarp of cv Liberty, Pik Red, and Rutgers were measured in relation to fruit development. Depending on the stage of fruit development, Liberty produced between 16 and 38% of the ethylene produced by Pik Red and Rutgers. The polyamines putrescine, spermidine, and spermine were present in all cultivars. Cadaverine was detected only in Rutgers. Levels of putrescine and spermidine declined between the immature and mature green stages of development and prior to the onset of climacteric ethylene production. In Pik Red and Rutgers, the decline persisted, whereas in Liberty, the putrescine level increased during ripening. Ripe pericarp of Liberty contained about three and six times more free (unconjugated) polyamines than Pik Red and Rutgers, respectively. No pronounced changes in spermidine or cadaverine occurred during ripening. The increase in the free polyamine level in ripe pericarp of Liberty may account for the reduction of climacteric ethylene production, and prolonged storage life.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wang, N. Schauer, B. Usadel, P. Frasse, M. Zouine, M. Hernould, A. Latche, J.-C. Pech, A. R. Fernie, and M. Bouzayen Regulatory Features Underlying Pollination-Dependent and -Independent Tomato Fruit Set Revealed by Transcript and Primary Metabolite Profiling PLANT CELL, May 1, 2009; 21(5): 1428 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Tassoni, C. B. Watkins, and P. J. Davies Inhibition of the ethylene response by 1-MCP in tomato suggests that polyamines are not involved in delaying ripening, but may moderate the rate of ripening or over-ripening J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2006; 57(12): 3313 - 3325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Zuzunaga, M. Serrano, D. Martinez-Romero, D. Valero, and F. Riquelme Comparative Study of Two Plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) Cultivars during Growth and Ripening Food Science and Technology International, April 1, 2001; 7(2): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Barrachina, D. V. Garrido, D. M. Romero, M. S. Mula, F. B. Carbonell, F. M. Sanchez, and F. R. Ballesteros Poliaminas: Biosintesis, metabolismo y su papel en la maduracion y manipulacion postrecoleccion de frutos / Polyamines: Biosynthesis, metabolism, and their role in ripening and postharvest handling of fruits Food Science and Technology International, January 1, 2000; 6(2): 85 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]