Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 92:666-671 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Langis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Steponkus, P. L.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Cryopreservation of Rye Protoplasts by Vitrification 1

Robert Langis and Peter L. Steponkus

Department of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

A procedure has been developed for the vitrification of mesophyll protoplasts isolated from leaves of nonacclimated (NA) and cold-acclimated (ACC) winter rye seedlings (Secale cereale L. cv Puma). The procedure involves (a) equilibration (loading) of the protoplasts with an intermediate concentration (1.5, 1.75, or 2.0 molar) of ethylene glycol (EG) at 20°C; (b) dehydration of the protoplasts in a concentrated vitrification solution made of 7 molar EG + 0.88 molar sorbitol + 6% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 0°C; (c) placing the protoplasts into polypropylene straws and quenching in liquid nitrogen (LN2); and (d) recovery of the protoplasts from LN2 and removal (unloading) of the vitrification solution. For NA protoplasts, 47 + 1% survival was obtained following recovery from LN2 if the protoplasts were first loaded with 1.75 molar EG prior to the dehydration step. However, to achieve this level of survival, NA protoplasts had to be unloaded in a hypertonic (2.0 osmolal [osm]) sorbitol solution. If they were unloaded in an isotonic solution (0.53 osm), survival was 3±2%. In contrast, survival of ACC protoplasts following recovery from LN2 was 34 ± 10% when the protoplasts were loaded in a 2.0 molar EG solution and unloaded in an isotonic sorbitol solution (1.03 osm). If ACC protoplasts were unloaded in an hypertonic sorbitol solution (1.5 osm), survival was 51 ± 9%. These results indicate that the osmotic excursions incurred during the procedure are a major factor affecting survival.


1 This study was supported by a gift from RJR-Nabisco, Inc.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists