Plant Physiology 93:26-32 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists
Metabolism and Enzymology
Comparison between NOx Evolution Mechanisms of Wild-Type and nr1 Mutant Soybean Leaves 1
Lowell Klepper
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0817
The nr1 soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) mutant does not contain the two constitutive nitrate reductases, one of which is responsible for enzymic conversion of nitrite to NOx (NO + NO2). It was tested for possible nonenzymic NOx formation and evolution because of known chemical reactions between NO2 and plant metabolites and the instability of nitrous acid. It did not evolve NOx during the in vivo NR assay, but intact leaves did evolve small amounts of NOx under dark, anaerobic conditions. Experiments were conducted to compare NO3 reduction, NO2 accumulation, and the NOx evolution processes of the wild type (cv Williams) and the nr1 mutant. In vivo NR assays showed that wild-type leaves had three times more NO3 reducing capacity than the nr1 mutant. NOx evolution from intact, anerobic nr1 leaves was approximately 10 to 20% that from wild-type leaves. Nitrite content of the nr1 mutant leaves was usually higher than wild type due to low NOx evolution. Lag times and threshold NO2 concentrations for NOx evolution were similar for the two genotypes. While only 1 to 2% of NOx from wild type is NO2, the nr1 mutant evolved 15 to 30% NO2. The kinetic patterns of NOx evolution with time weré completely different for the mutant and wild type. Comparisons of light and heat treatments also gave very different results. It is generally accepted that the NOx evolution by wild type is primarily an enzymic conversion of NO2 to NO. However, this report concludes that NOx evolution by the nr1 mutant was due to nonenzymic, chemical reactions between plant metabolites and accumulated NO2 and/or decomposition of nitrous acid. Nonenzymic NOx evolution probably also occurs in wild type to a degree but could be easily masked by high rates of the enzymic process.
1 Published as paper No. 8972, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Arnaud, I. Murgia, J. Boucherez, J.-F. Briat, F. Cellier, and F. Gaymard
An Iron-induced Nitric Oxide Burst Precedes Ubiquitin-dependent Protein Degradation for Arabidopsis AtFer1 Ferritin Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 18, 2006;
281(33):
23579 - 23588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Crawford
Mechanisms for nitric oxide synthesis in plants
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2006;
57(3):
471 - 478.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perazzolli, M. C. Romero-Puertas, and M. Delledonne
Modulation of nitric oxide bioactivity by plant haemoglobins
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2006;
57(3):
479 - 488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-Q. Guo and N. M. Crawford
Arabidopsis Nitric Oxide Synthase1 Is Targeted to Mitochondria and Protects against Oxidative Damage and Dark-Induced Senescence
PLANT CELL,
December 1, 2005;
17(12):
3436 - 3450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perazzolli, P. Dominici, M. C. Romero-Puertas, E. Zago, J. Zeier, M. Sonoda, C. Lamb, and M. Delledonne
Arabidopsis Nonsymbiotic Hemoglobin AHb1 Modulates Nitric Oxide Bioactivity
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2004;
16(10):
2785 - 2794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Stohr and W. R. Ullrich
Generation and possible roles of NO in plant roots and their apoplastic space
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2002;
53(379):
2293 - 2303.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Sakihama, S. Nakamura, and H. Yamasaki
Nitric Oxide Production Mediated by Nitrate Reductase in the Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: an Alternative NO Production Pathway in Photosynthetic Organisms
Plant Cell Physiol.,
March 1, 2002;
43(3):
290 - 297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Rockel, F. Strube, A. Rockel, J. Wildt, and W. M. Kaiser
Regulation of nitric oxide (NO) production by plant nitrate reductase in vivo and in vitro
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2002;
53(366):
103 - 110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|