Plant Physiology 93:1610-1619 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists
Development and Growth Regulation
Wall Extensibility and Cell Hydraulic Conductivity Decrease in Enlarging Stem Tissues at Low Water Potentials 1
Hiroshi Nonami2 and
John S. Boyer
College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware 19958,
College of Agriculture, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware 19958
Measurements with a guillotine psychrometer (H Nonami, JS Boyer [1990] Plant Physiol 94: 1601-1609) indicate that the inhibition of stem growth at low water potentials (low w) is accompanied by decreases in cell wall extensibility and tissue hydraulic conductance to water that eventually limit growth rate in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). To check this conclusion, we measured cell wall properties and cell hydraulic conductivities with independent techniques in soybean seedlings grown and treated the same way, i.e. grown in the dark and exposed to low w by transplanting dark grown seedlings to vermiculite of low water content. Wall properties were measured with an extensiometer modified for intact plants, and conductances were measured with a cell pressure probe in intact plants. Theory was developed to relate the wall measurements to those with the psychrometer. In the elongation zone, the plastic deformability of the walls decreased when measured with the extensiometer while growth was inhibited at low w. It increased during a modest growth recovery. This behavior was the same as that for the wall extensibility observed previously with the psychrometer. Tissue that was killed before measurement with the extensiometer also showed a similar response, indicating that changes in wall extensibility represented changes in wall physical properties and not rates of wall biosynthesis. The elastic compliance (reciprocal of bulk elastic modulus) did not change in the elongating or mature tissue. The hydraulic conductivity of cortical cells decreased in the elongating tissue and increased slightly during growth recovery in a response similar to that observed with the psychrometer. We conclude that the plastic properties of the cell walls and the conductance of the cells to water were decreased at low w but that the elastic properties of the walls were of little consequence in this response.
2 Present address: Department of Bio-mechanical Systems, College of Agriculture, Ehime University, Tarumi, Matsuyama 790, Japan.
1 Supported by Department of Energy grant DE-FG02-87ER13776 and a grant from E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company to J.S.B.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Proseus and J. S. Boyer
Identifying cytoplasmic input to the cell wall of growing Chara corallina
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2006;
57(12):
3231 - 3242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-C. Tang and J. S. Boyer
Root pressurization affects growth-induced water potentials and growth in dehydrated maize leaves
J. Exp. Bot.,
November 1, 2003;
54(392):
2479 - 2488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-C. Tang and J. S. Boyer
Growth-induced water potentials and the growth of maize leaves
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2002;
53(368):
489 - 503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. van der Weerd, M. M.A.E. Claessens, T. Ruttink, F. J. Vergeldt, T. J. Schaafsma, and H. Van As
Quantitative NMR microscopy of osmotic stress responses in maize and pearl millet
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2001;
52(365):
2333 - 2343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Boyer
Growth-induced water potentials originate from wall yielding during growth
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2001;
52(360):
1483 - 1488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Proseus, J. K.E. Ortega, and J. S. Boyer
Separating Growth from Elastic Deformation during Cell Enlargement
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 1999;
119(2):
775 - 784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Bogoslavsky and P. M. Neumann
Rapid Regulation by Acid pH of Cell Wall Adjustment and Leaf Growth in Maize Plants Responding to Reversal of Water Stress
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 1998;
118(2):
701 - 709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
|
|