Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 94:463-469 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wullschleger, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Oosterhuis, D. M.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Photosynthetic and Respiratory Activity of Fruiting Forms within the Cotton Canopy 1

Stan D. Wullschleger and Derrick M. Oosterhuis

Altheimer Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701

The supply of photosynthates by leaves for reproductive development in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) has been extensively studied. However, the contribution of assimilates derived from the fruiting forms themselves is inconclusive. Field experiments were conducted to document the photosynthetic and respiratory activity of cotton leaves, bracts, and capsule walls from anthesis to fruit maturity. Bracts achieved peak photosynthetic rates of 2.1 micromoles per square meter per second compared with 16.5 micromoles per square meter per second for the subtending leaf. However, unlike the subtending leaf, the bracts did not show a dramatic decline in photosynthesis with increased age, nor was their photosynthesis as sensitive as leaves to low light and water-deficit stress. The capsule wall was only a minor site of 14CO2 fixation from the ambient atmosphere. Dark respiration by the developing fruit averaged –18.7 micromoles per square meter per second for 6 days after anthesis and declined to –2.7 micromoles per square meter per second after 40 days. Respiratory loss of CO2 was maximal at –158 micromoles CO2 per fruit per hour at 20 days anthesis. Diurnal patterns of dark respiration for the fruit were age dependent and closely correlated with stomatal conductance of the capsule wall. Stomata on the capsule wall of young fruit were functional, but lost this capacity with increasing age. Labeled 14CO2 injected into the fruit interior was rapidly assimilated by the capsule wall in the light but not in the dark, while fiber and seed together fixed significant amounts of 14CO2 in both the light and dark. These data suggest that cotton fruiting forms, although sites of significant respiratory CO2 loss, do serve a vital role in the recycling of internal CO2 and therein, function as important sources of assimilate for reproductive development.


1 Published with permission from the Director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Fayetteville, AR.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists