Plant Physiol. Illumina
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 94:499-506 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, B. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, B. B.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Pyrophosphate Fructose-6-P 1-Phosphotransferase from Tomato Fruit 1

Evidence for Change during Ripening

Joshua H. Wong, Ferenc Kiss2, Ming-X Wu3 and Bob B. Buchanan

Department of Plant Biology, Genetics and Plant Biology Building, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720

Three forms of pyrophosphate fructose-6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP) were purified from both green and red tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit: (a) a classical form (designated Q2) containing {alpha}- (66 kilodalton) and beta- (60 kilodalton) subunits; (b) a form (Q1) containing a beta-doublet subunit; and (c) a form (Q0) that appeared to contain a beta-singlet subunit. Several lines of evidence suggested that the different forms occur under physiological conditions. Q2 was purified to apparent electrophoretic homogeneity; Q1 and Q0 were highly purified, but not to homogeneity. The distribution of the PFP forms from red (versus green) tomato was: Q2, 29% (90%); Q1, 47% (6%); and Q0, 24% (4%). The major difference distinguishing the red from the green tomato enzymes was the fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2)-induced change in Km for fructose-6-phosphate (Fru-6-P), the `green forms' showing markedly enhanced affinity on activation (Km decrease of 7-9-fold) and the `red forms' showing either little change (Q0, Q1) or a relatively small (2.5-fold) affinity increase (Q2). The results extend our earlier findings with carrot root to another tissue and indicate that forms of PFP showing low or no affinity increase for Fru 6-P on activation by Fru-2,6-P2 (here Q1 and Q0) are associated with sugar storage, whereas the classical form (Q2), which shows a pronounced affinity increase, is more important for starch storage.


2 Permanent address: Department of Biology, György Bessenyei College, Nyiregyháza, Hungary.

3 Permanent address: Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology, 300 Fonglin Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China 200032.

1 This work was supported by grants from the Cellular Biochemistry, U.S.-Hungary, and U.S.-China Programs of the National Science Foundation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY® THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists