Plant Physiology 95:305-315 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists
Membranes and Bioenergetics
Water Transport across Maize Roots 1
Simultaneous Measurement of Flows at the Cell and Root Level by Double Pressure Probe Technique
Guo Li Zhu and
Ernst Steudle
Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenökologie, Universität Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, D-8580 Bayreuth, Federal Republic of Germany
A double pressure probe technique was used to measure simultaneously water flows and hydraulic parameters of individual cells and of excised roots of young seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.) in osmotic experiments. By following initial flows of water at the cell and root level and by estimating the profiles of driving forces (water potentials) across the root, the hydraulic conductivity of individual cell layers was evaluated. Since the hydraulic conductivity of the cell-to-cell path was determined separately, the hydraulic conductivity of the cell wall material could be evaluated as well (Lpcw = 0.3 to 6.10–9 per meter per second per megapascal). Although, for radial water flow across the cortex and rhizodermis, the apoplasmic path was predominant, the contribution of the hydraulic conductance of the cell-to-cell path to the overall conductance increased significantly from the first layer of the cortex toward the inner layers from 2% to 23%. This change was mainly due to an increase of the hydraulic conductivity of the cell membranes which was Lp = 1.9.10–7 per meter per second per megapascal in the first layer and Lp = 14 to 9.10–7 per meter per second per megapascal in the inner layers of the cortex. The hydraulic conductivity of entire roots depended on whether hydrostatic or osmotic forces were used to induce water flows. Hydrostatic Lpr was 1.2 to 2.3.10–7 per meter per second per megapascal and osmotic Lpr = 1.6 to 2.8.10–8 per meter per second per megapascal. The apparent reflection coefficients of root cells ( s) of nonpermeating solutes (KCI, PEG 6000) decreased from values close to unity in the rhizodermis to about 0.7 to 0.8 in the cortex. In all cases, however, s was significantly larger than the reflection coefficient of entire roots (sr). For KCI and PEG 6000, sr was 0.53 and 0.64, respectively. The results are discussed in terms of a composite membrane model of the root.
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Sonderforschungsbereich 137.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
T. Knipfer and E. Steudle
Root hydraulic conductivity measured by pressure clamp is substantially affected by internal unstirred layers
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
59(8):
2071 - 2084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. X. Kim and E. Steudle
Light and turgor affect the water permeability (aquaporins) of parenchyma cells in the midrib of leaves of Zea mays
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 7, 2007;
(2007)
erm270v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. Meyer, E. Steudle, and C. A. Peterson
Patterns and kinetics of water uptake by soybean seeds
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
58(3):
717 - 732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Aroca, G. Amodeo, S. Fernandez-Illescas, E. M. Herman, F. Chaumont, and M. J. Chrispeels
The Role of Aquaporins and Membrane Damage in Chilling and Hydrogen Peroxide Induced Changes in the Hydraulic Conductance of Maize Roots
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2005;
137(1):
341 - 353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Wan, E. Steudle, and W. Hartung
Gating of water channels (aquaporins) in cortical cells of young corn roots by mechanical stimuli (pressure pulses): effects of ABA and of HgCl2
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2004;
55(396):
411 - 422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Steudle
Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2000;
51(350):
1531 - 1542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Barrowclough, C. A. Peterson, and E. Steudle
Radial hydraulic conductivity along developing onion roots
J. Exp. Bot.,
March 1, 2000;
51(344):
547 - 557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. T. Clarkson, M. Carvajal, T. Henzler, R. N. Waterhouse, A. J. Smyth, D. T. Cooke, and E. Steudle
Root hydraulic conductance: diurnal aquaporin expression and the effects of nutrient stress
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2000;
51(342):
61 - 70.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X. Wan and J. J. Zwiazek
Mercuric Chloride Effects on Root Water Transport in Aspen Seedlings
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 1999;
121(3):
939 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Chaumont, F. Barrieu, E. M. Herman, and M. J. Chrispeels
Characterization of a Maize Tonoplast Aquaporin Expressed in Zones of Cell Division and Elongation
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 1998;
117(4):
1143 - 1152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
